Dr.Pangloss

Utterly outstanding posts. It's against the rules, not the law. Hence why they are chucked out and not charged. And when the point of people not complaining about the weans standing comes up, what are they meant to do? Walk up and take on a group of alcopopped idiots or contact a steward? Contact a steward and we have what happened yesterday. They had to move from the seat they chose and wanted to sit in, because a bunch of clowns can't move up the back or sit down.

Fabrication to try and prove your point. Proof of a weak argument. Rules are in place for a reason. And for what it's worth, I enjoy myself at the football regardless of whether I'm standing or sitting.

What do people get out of reading a thread with 3 pages worth of folk agreeing and "+1"ing? It's called 'debate'. You are on a discussion forum after all. Hitler wasn't one for debates.

That's obviously a problem with each grounds stewards, but the point still stands, had they been sitting in their seats, there would not have been a problem.

Personal abuse aside (from which I take it you were our well spoken caller), it is not a crime to support your team. It is against the rules to stand in a seated stadium. How much do you feel fans should get away with under the "supporting your team" line?

Standing is against the rules. They broke the rules. Whether or not you agree with these rules, "someone else was doing it" is no defence. Again, behave and you will not be thrown out. So what one of the braintrust was just on the radio?

Stopped reading here. I can only hope there's more of a basis to this new banner making party than this inaccuracy. I've been going to matches up and down the UK and not once have I been subject to 'heavy hands'. Probably because I behave myself. Innocent people won't be affected by this.

Umm. Can I... Better not. Might get deleted and I may be banned.

-WATCH HIS INTERVIEW ON MFC TV- It's very easy to pick out examples to prove your point, weeyin. And make sure you go click that little '-' button on the right there.

I see that users of the official site that don't want skinned out of more money for utter crap, now get a 2 line summary of a story and a link to the tv crap. Stroke of genius, that. Stopped using it, even BBC have the news quicker, and (identity crisis apart) are better written, by actual journalists.

Loving the lack of priority. Atmosphere? Nah. Quality? No need. NEW MASCOTS!!!!

Look at the number of locked threads on the first page alone. Steelmen Online - Taking the 'Discussion' out of 'Discussion Board'.

Naisy is not a dirty player. Hope he makes a full recovery, and quickly.

Source ffs,

This seems to be the general theme of this thread, but "they do it too" is hardly an excuse. Ah, if it's in an orange order hall, then who gives a fuck.

I don't really believe you should shut anyone with an opinion up. This is a "discussion" site after all, one post and 40 underneath agreeing is hardly discussion. Which in turn makes these little score things down the bottom of each post rather farcical. Please rate my opinion.

That's just about the same number of "stop being so negative" threads as negative threads now.

Lucky you didn't . You would have looked like an idiot.

Performance maybe? Sorry, engaged my brain for a second. Pretty sure it's in the rules here not to do so.

They're referencing their source, what's the issue? If someone who hasn't heard of this place reads it and joins, then it's a bit of free advertising.

"Access to Players and Management" ? Seems rather ominous. My £25k will be going on coke and hookers, thanks.

I see.

Who was putting in most of the deliveries? Yeah. And Morrison for that matter. Not based on his performance yesterday right enough. Humphrey shouldn't be, and isn't anywhere near the Scotland set up.

That is why he's in the squad. I'm glad we agree. I do think Murphy should've been in the squad for the Nations Cup, but I don't pick the squad.