nethertonwellfan

Nothing ventured..............

But If the income is dropping then there can't be a limit on how much you cut back can there? I don't like the cut backs but as long as income is falling there is no real choice. As for McHugh, someone said that McHugh has scored more goals for us than he's had starts. That's not a bad record to be honest. I would like to judge him after about 10 starts than 10-20 minutes in games given that some of them may be over by the time he's on the park.

Shaka has delusions of grandeur as far as Motherwell Football Club are concened, thank god he isn't in control of our finances or we'd be oot the game. Oh and welcome back John Sutton.

Cheers, I only tuned in for the Second round draw so I didn't know that they were doing this.

Aye one seeded number was put in a pot followed by an unseeded number, they drew them out the pot to determine home advantage and that was 10 ties done and dusted. I didnae have a clue what was happening.

Agreed, I didn't really understand what went on in that draw. 2 numbers got drawn and that drew 10 ties, mental if you ask me.

Did someone ask if Novo could do a job?

The daily record has a better strike rate than that football rumours site. Enough said!

Guessing ?

You say "let's look for players we can sell on and get the club some cash in the future." If we sign Sutton he has either looked at what there is and doesn't believe there is anything out there on our budget that has more potential than youngsters at the club or he hasn't bothered looking. It must have been one of them and I know what one I believe it to be. To sum up there is loads of assumption in the first post you have quoted .

The same as you're guessing that he hasn't looked at getting free sellable assets.

Maybe McCall has scoured the market down south and he feels that the available options are no better that the youngsters we have a this club (eg. Craig Moore) and the money would be better spent on a bit of experience in the forward line that'll compliment said youth.

So you and other saying you don't want him because he left us in the past? Do you not think that's a bit daft considering numerous players ahve returned to us in our recent past? The only doubt over Sutton is what he done since he left us. That's fair game but he was far form shite or lazy when he left us and if he does return he wont be the only player in our team who has returned.

Top post Andy P. Some of our best players left us for pastures new and returned, let's punt them too .

Sutton was never lazy.

People slating John Sutton have very short memories. Also how would John Sutton be taking a wage cut coming to us? We won't be offering him less than nothing.

It'll be a Sunday because of the Europa League tie on the Thursday night. Just noticed I'm way late with this

There are a lot of assumptions being made of the Caley players. You never know there may actually be a few gems in there. Butcher done alright with his signings last season.

I understand but the I would also hope we don't sign players just for the sake of signings. Improving the sqaud is what it's all about.

You can tell people are bored without the fitba.

Not true!

Did Boyle not gift his shares to the Club? John Boyle will not receive any money for the shares but the club will which they will use in cash flow shortages. I don't really see the problem to be honest.

Aye it's the website. It happens to me too but I just click refresh and goes on to the correct page.

I think if they can get more of the 400k up front rather than add ons then they will take it. I think a split of 300k/100k will be very tempting to the club.

That Everton attempt is very poor clip art. It's gone down very bad with the Everton fans.