Well well has broken the golden rule of Steelmenonline - thou shalt not criticise in the wake of a victory.
Personally, I don't see anything wrong with pointing out the many failings particularly in the first half. Goal aside it was pretty poor. We opted for the long ball far too early and the defending at times was reminiscent of last years shambles. So for that alone I can see why people might just want to bring it up.
I thought Tanner, even with a goal to his name, was murder. Far too easily pushed off the ball and otherwise pretty anonymous. Heneghan, at times, looked like the player none of us could believe anyone would pay a penny for.
Second half, we dominated possession but Queens defending turned into a total shambles as they tired badly. We are going to have to be far more creative if we are going to break down anyone of a decent standard, and there's the worry.
On to the positives, Carl McHugh was excellent, Cadden looked more like his old self and Bowman continues to confound his critics. Carson, Bigi and Kipre out of the new players looked decent.