Jump to content

steelman1991

Legends
  • Posts

    1,995
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    19

Everything posted by steelman1991

  1. That isn't going to help my sleep pattern any - that's for sure 🤣
  2. I haven't been able to sleep since Thursday 😆. At nearly 65 you'd think you'd be past all that.
  3. Sorry - guys total brain fart - thanks for confirming.
  4. Doubling up at the turnstyles should be easily avoided by having a barrier with a line of stewards/police checking tickets at the entrance from Dalzell Drive. No ticket no entry. It used to happen years ago all around the ground.
  5. Do we know why Stam ran right up the tunnel?
  6. Looks like Shaun Rooney is avilable 😀
  7. Just marginally over 1000 away fans - so a pretty decent home attendance.
  8. Given it's Rangers we play, I'd say there is no chance we'll be allocated parking in the main car park. Last time we played them we were allocated car parking at the Toryglen end of the stadium, just at the traffic lights - imagine if that's still available that's where we'll be parked this time.
  9. Link? EDIT - It's OK I see he addresses it in his recent interview.
  10. Must admit I had a chuckle when I posted, given some of the discussion recently. But, YES. 😆
  11. Reckon this thread has run it's course.
  12. I must have been at a different match to a lot of you guys. I don’t remember us creating a lot of chances 🤷‍♂️
  13. I wonder if Kettlewell would pay to watch that shite. 🤷‍♂️
  14. Geez this place gets depressing at times. We were quite comfortable yesterday and on another day might have added another 2 or 3 to our goal tally. Thought the front 2 gelled well and Robinson looks like he could be handful for defenders this season. One thing though I don’t see the back 3 who started yesterday being the 3 we start with on opening day.
  15. Hunter Stand only for home fans. Not sure where the Livi fan is sitting.
  16. I hope the WS are closely monitoring this thread and P&B, because there is clearly a wealth of talented individuals, in the support, who have their finger on the pulse and are extremely "swtiched on". They have to try and engage these folks and persuade them to get involved directly with them.
  17. He's employed by the Club and I would expect him to take direction from the Executive Board, who hired him. Think you're being overly critical of someone who's position doesn't exist to jump to the tune of the Society, or it's members. This disconnect between WS and Board is everything that's wrong with the current issues we're having.
  18. He's not in his position to do that - that's surely the job of the WS reps elected on the Society ticket.
  19. No need - the whole subject is emotive. I didn't take time to really comprehend the intention.
  20. I wasn't referring to myself though - trying to explain why maybe the guy who santheman was having a spat with on facebook might be rationalising his thought pattern. As I said I know of at least 2 folk who feel that the club should be run along the lines of 50 years ago when we had a majority shareholder..
  21. Why would I do that? The comment you posted on wasn't about me but someone santheman was having a "spat" with on facebook.
×
×
  • Create New...