The definition of entertaining is providing amusement or enjoyment. You could argue that our attempts to defend are amusing. Granted that's a feeling felt by the opposition. The joy surely comes from whether we win or lose or a goal scored. So taking hibs game, in our own way we were very entertaining.
Perhaps the question should be, do we try to achieve our targets by playing negatively? The answer is yes we do. We try to be competitive against teams with better resources taking into consideration our players form and fitness. Is it pretty to watch, no! but it's got us 31 points and a good chance of survival in a league where modern football is all about money and what a club can afford to spend on their team on the pitch. Just look at Aberdeen splashing the cash just now. Whether that's sensible who knows, but it's the modern way, where instant results matter more than long term player development. Society has changed for the worst. No hiding places, no patience and unrealistic expectations.
After all that, was that not why we tried to get extra funding? Just so we can continue to compete against teams spending money, even if they run up huge debts.
I would love us to play an attacking all out style. But it's never going to happen. We will never have 10 outfield players good enough. Bigger clubs with the odd exception have hoovered up all the promising youngsters.
The injuries this season are mental. Although the system we play is broadly the same, players in the team are not. Perhaps if things settle and full fitness and confidence returns we might alter our approach to games.
Scottish football at the level we are, does not allow any scope for teams to play anything other than survival tactics. To many jobs are at risk if a club fails.