weeyin

He seems to have been pish everywhere he's played recently. Didn't exactly set Dens Park alight with his contribution. Guys like Moult and McHugh managed to perform in our weaker teams.

Ditto. Best bit of business we did in recent times was to sell him when we did. He's been on a downward spiral since.

I received a couple of emails, saw the posts on here and multiple tweets. Not sure what else could have been done. And I say that as someone who has often complained about the Society's lack of communication.

Mostly, I think, because he gets asked the same question at every press conference. He's said about 50 times he's looking to bring in a bit of pace up front, so it's not exactly a secret. However, he's not going to tell the media who his targets are or the progress of any potential deals.

This is going to be a difficult game. Be happy if we take a point.

I think Kipré' was one of those deals where he wanted to re-establish himself and move on if it worked out.

I'm just waiting for the "why did we only sign him for one year?"complaints.

Be looking to recreate his glory days at Accies. Seriously, though - seems like a good signing.

Robinson said he saw the replay and thinks it was definitely a penalty, but not a red card.

It's match fitness I'm talking about. And that's all about game time.

The dilemma with Moult is he's obviously a few weeks behind the rest after his surgery, and needs game time. So do we give him 30 minutes here or there to get him up to speed or persevere with 80+ minutes every week.

If this did get up and running, I imagine fees would just cover the costs. If you want to contribute to the club, however, the Well Society is the way to go.

I just meant that people saying it's "possible" doesn't mean it's true.

It's possible they offered me higher wages than Moult.

Just watched the highlights on youtube and the 3rd was actually onside. You can see from the lines on the grass he timed his run perfectly.

Official MFC Twitter said the winner looked offside, so maybe we got a break there.

Did they have anyone sent off? That's the only way I can see allowing a 4th sub.

That link is for last year's Scottish Cup.

If the officials were competent, they might have noticed we snuck on a 4th sub,

It typically means the lawyers made a deal and neither side is allowed to say anything about the other. Good or bad.

So this is what a Cup run feels like? It's OK.

I know who's winning that tackle.

Tanner can also play as a winger, but I doubt he'll line up there tonight.

The biggest technical challenge, I suspect, would be applying the appropriate geographic restrictions. But I imagine services like Youtube Live Stream manage that.

Sounds like a job for our marketing department to rustle up a partnership with a hosting company.