weeyin

BTW, here is the extent of the Well Society twitter updates from the Reconstruction Discussion i.e. the "major points"

That would require internet, which I was told wasn't available to the club at the last meeting!

In fairness, I raised this issue months ago when the Well Society was being formed and no action was taken. They made a big deal about all the overseas members they were attracting and were actively pursuing ex-pats for their cash, but have done nothing to make sure they can participate. I didn't even receive ballot papers for the Sevco vote. I'm on twitter and follow both the club and the Well Society. There was scant information tweeted on either. And how difficult would it be to distribute the presentation during or even after the meeting? In the 21st century it's really easy to set up a conference call facility - some are even free and given that I raised the problem prior to the first Society meeting (almost 1 year ago!), there has been plenty of time to sort out the basics.

Faddy scored 24 goals in the 201 league appearances since he left. I think we need his creativity more than his goal tally. However, I don't think anyone but you would base McCall's tactics one one substitute appearance of a guy that's not even match fit.

When they Well Society meeting was called to discuss these proposals, I asked if they would set up a conference call or some sort of internet stream so the overseas members (and domestic members who live some distance away) could participate. The answer was "Naw". At the very least they could have recorded it and shared the presentation materials.

I'd be more cynical if the Well Society had allowed me to listen to the information at the last meeting. I'm working with 3rd hand information at the moment.

I heard part of the reason clubs like ours are voting for the weird league structure is because part of the deal also gets rid of the 11 - 1 majority requirements. So if 7 clubs don't want the OF to get a bigger split, they can vote it down.

Doesn't the new change in voting structure mean Sevco can't railroad any changes when they are back in the top flight though?

He's not a striker. McCall was pretty up front about that when he signed him and even commented on his lack of goals while he was on trial.

Change days since they used to open one gate up at half time and let everyone in for free.

Aye, read that he was expecting to sign this week.

Rik James

I've never been a fan of the split in general, but that last post could do with a few.

In fact, when Dundee Utd and Aberdeen were winning the league it was a 10 team set up. Not sure what that proves either, tbh.

Any win, any way, will be a great result. 1 - 0 will do for me.

Aberdeen will make a late run after they sign Faddy on Wednesday.

Slane was a badly advised wean when he left. If McCall wanted him back I'd be willing to give him a second chance to see if he matured. If he apologised and said he wanted to try again, he might be a better player (and a better person) for it. I was more scunnered with the repeated antics of guys like Paul Quinn who, as captain, should have known better and who didn't learn from his mistakes.

Seriously? A few things off the top of my head Analysing DVD from last game or too to identify good and bad points Working on those points with players one-to-one Working out tactics for next game Planning training drills to address any of the above items Overseeing training drills/bounce games to monitor players' form/injuries Media duties Overseeing U20 team tactics and development Attending U20 games to monitor progress of youngsters and making any adjustments to team to help promotion of players to first team Working with board on budgets, players, contracts Reviewing the hundreds of requests from agents to look at players' DVDs Watching games to identify potential targets to replace players he realistically expects to lose in the summer Involvement in schools/community activities Involvement in supporters events And I'm sure there is plenty more.

We already run on a skeleton staff compared to many clubs. And in the modern game, it's the assistant manager that runs the day to day, taking all the training sessions etc. while the manager deals with the bigger picture.

ICT have beaten us once (out of 9 attempts) at Fir Park since 2007. I wish we weren't that special against the other SPL teams.

100% yes on that one, because where we are in a fortnight isn't a predictor of our final league position.

I wasn't able to attend the Well Society discussions, but my dad was and what he told me was presented is this: a) We have no league sponsor for next year, but a few people (and TV companies) are saying they are only interested if we change things up a bit b) the redistribution of funds is aimed, at least partly, to give more money to the lower league teams c) if passed, the new league structure would be in place for 3 years, after which time it's up for review d) the new proposals will get rid of the 11 - 1 voting requirement which, thanks to a couple of other clubs, is currently preventing any proposal to expand the current league e) the hope of our club is that once the voting system changes and the lower leagues get more money, then in 3 years time there will sufficient momentum to expand the top flight (and better funded lower league clubs to join), and the 11 - 1 won't be required to vote it through In this context I can understand where they are coming from (whether I agree with it or not - I'd near more hard facts to make a decision). My fear is that the game will take a major hit before the 3 years is up, and that the review doesn't take place at that time.

What's he been offered to stay so far? You seem to be in the know.

feeble effort. 1/10

Good that they voted no, but as they are one of the clubs likely to get dragged into the 8 team (zero points) relegation playoff, it might be a self-preservation decision rather than for the good of the game. I might just be getting cynical though.