Jump to content

Onthefringes

Legends
  • Posts

    3,591
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    62

Onthefringes last won the day on February 19

Onthefringes had the most liked content!

6 Followers

About Onthefringes

  • Birthday 11/01/1974

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Upper New Stevenston

Recent Profile Visitors

13,914 profile views

Onthefringes's Achievements

International

International (8/10)

1k

Reputation

  1. Do the hospitality package, recommended.
  2. šŸ¤” It’s parochial in its truest sense of narrow, limited, or provincial outlook, focusing only on those issues rather than broader perspectives Transport logistics being described are an issue for Ravenscraig and been there since early construction due design and bad management in an area that was the largest development site of its kind in Europe when created. Would be remiss of the club not to explore opportunities. Were the decision made to stay at Fir Park, it’s arguable it’s not the win the insular of thinking are proposing - nothing in their argument I’ve read is of major benefit to the club.
  3. Basing opposition due existing transport configuration and an unwillingness to envisage what could be, the parochial views don’t add any value to the discussion. How much redevelopment do some think is achievable at current locale? For example, footprint will never afford parking facilities. Is access likely to be improved? I’d hope feasibility study would take cognisance of the future development of the link road that will pass by the stadium as traffic flow removes the already limited crossing provision. I certainly got the impression at last years’ AGM our board hadn’t it marked for consideration. Closing statement is poor analogy in my view. Hardly ripping the club out a community and ā€˜decent pub incorporated and some office blocks’ for use are ideals that our board have alluded to as bridging operational gaps we experience in the here and now. Still, far too many variables even before we discuss funding which I feel is for another debate.
  4. Fucking hell. Thats’s not what was being said. It’s easy to discount the wild theory of some in favour of listening to those tasked to do so. I’ve offered plenty of opinion on the matters you say, I’m appreciative my thinking aligns currently and enjoying it while it lasts. Disappointed as we all are, fact is we had no better chance than we do any other year.
  5. Disagree with Jens all you like, there’s a reason he’s in post and you’re offering opinion on a forum.
  6. You’ve obviously not been listening to the manager… ā€˜load management’ is often mentioned. Given hectic schedule, I was comfortable with changes. We get it, an opportunity missed. A lot of variables went against us tonight. ā€˜All on Jens’ and questioning Matty Connolly’s inclusion is quite the stretch. Maybe some should look at the bigger picture…
  7. Knicker wetting in the extreme. Invest in pampers
  8. He’ll have a better idea after 3pm inspection today… Falling as sleet currently
  9. When the seating is replaced unless Mr Caldwell is a dead ringer for Pinocchio. A return to match thread will be most welcomed
  10. It’s as if the club hierarchy weren’t open in their explanation of preserving lifespan of current seating infrastructure šŸ¤” Wear and tear, refreshing by blow torch take your pick šŸ¤·ā€ā™‚ļø
  11. Same outlook as Hibs the other week. Physicality and brute force. We got wise and moved the ball quicker. Game over
  12. Not aesthetically pleasing to the eye, but, it’s certainly not cutting up and plays fast.
×
×
  • Create New...