Jump to content

Onthefringes

Legends
  • Posts

    3,496
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    59

Onthefringes last won the day on September 14 2023

Onthefringes had the most liked content!

6 Followers

About Onthefringes

  • Birthday 11/01/1974

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Upper New Stevenston

Recent Profile Visitors

9,851 profile views

Onthefringes's Achievements

International

International (8/10)

944

Reputation

  1. Honestly? I’ll you and your ilk denigrate another thread. Some of us will rejoice in our 6th win in 7.
  2. Here we go again 🙄 For the record, I don’t have to.
  3. Behave. Win 2-1 away from home & that’s what you post. Deary me. Certainly wasn’t the case.
  4. Wanting to relocate is way different to medium to long term planning to relocate. Admirable production and well researched by Mr Cameron and of interest to many. It’s a subject that’s been done to death on here though and nothing new offered by parochial thinking. Currently not viable, funding isn’t available. That’s accepted - I’d wager that’s the outlook being taken by our CEO rather than a flat ‘no’ to any move. Did he offer opinion on the fanciful notion of developing current home? if it hadn’t been for the financial collapse in 2008, I don’t think it’s too much of a stretch to think we’d already be part of a wider development before now as would Motherwell Town Centre.
  5. Always seen that area as the main car park which runs the length from Lesser Hampden towards South East and Aitkenhead Road. Usually only by arrangement and dependant on what area of the ground you’re allocated. Club buses were split on last visit and we were parked around Queens Park/Battlefield Road and others were outside Hampden. I’ll see how it goes.
  6. Are the buses sure to be parked in Hampden’s car park?
  7. Casey wasn’t sent off for denying a certain goal. Butland’s positioning counts for nothing when both offences deny a clear goalscoring opportunity… consistency is key.
  8. That’s the crux. Point in the direction ‘told that it didn’t happen’…. And ‘saw it with their own eyes’ doesn’t always give a full picture. That’s reason for little balance between some posts. O’Donnell incident was done to death real time - the drink wasn’t thrown directly at him. Poor aim granted*, it was thrown at much maligned group who stood basically pitchside spoiling views of others. Player himself recognised that at a later date. *Thats not to condone, nor play down.
  9. He’ll always be defined by that quote. Had built a fairly strong team on little budget last season prior to returning North. Definitely better than County the twice I seen them. Club ownership problems deepened and that little budget has decreased and the basket case looks like taking them to Conference at best.
  10. What purpose does it serve? Going over old ground, information sometimes comes from a position of trust. Doubt I’d be the only who wouldn’t just repeat to appease others who don’t wish to seek and find for themselves. Then you set off on a tangent… the topic isn’t about me. I could discuss biology in one part, your mask just slips on the second. We see you.
  11. Placation. No denial incidents don’t take place. Answering yes, I justifiably play them down. It’s a world away from condoning behaviours. Precursors have been stated over many threads and I fail to see the benefit of repeat. It certainly won’t change the viewpoint of those who refuse to look at the bigger picture..
  12. You don’t agree with posting style, don’t read. It’s not difficult. If you’re not prepared to source the information which is readily available why should others share? As I’ve said, far from positive. You find it embarrassing, I’m a little ambivalent given the variables. Whataboutery isn’t a great trait either. Again, perhaps could’ve worded better, these A4 sheets were placed by a minority for use by a majority without challenge. Isn’t that right Bob?
  13. Worded incorrectly then, ‘incidents’. Granted, far from positive, played down as I disagree on the mock outrage portrayed by some on here. Secondly, stop attempting to twist my wording to suit your opinion. Nobody suggested whatever led to the incidents justified the outcomes. Some understanding of the precursor may alter ‘perceptions rather than the belief their version is the reality. Circles.
  14. I’d condemn them if they didn’t reply in kind to a fellow supporter (not attached to any grouping) being attacked by patrons of a public house where no one had entered that day. Unfortunate bi-product, damage witnessed by plenty from inside the pub compounding the problem. More poor application of the law and ineffective policing.
×
×
  • Create New...