Onthefringes

Same posters, same false narrative. For those who understand no explanation is necessary. For those who don’t no explanation will suffice.

See above. Interpretation of alleged SPFL ‘rules’ which haven’t been breached according to the legal advice of the law practice with the highest success rate in quashing football convictions - young ‘uns have met them as a group recently… Maybe for another debate, Club can preach about ‘community’ and growing the fanbase. Many (involved and not) feel it’s lip service.

Different to what you claimed earlier. That’s a fact.

Not that I’m aware of.

At least keep to the facts. Most have been back in since with no issue.

Off on a tangent. Again. Not the same events. Similar issue, latest ‘unacceptable conduct’ signage the brainchild of our CEO so box ticked as he ‘did it at Shrewsbury’. Having heard versions from both sides it looks like a certain club employee who’s had carte blanche has tied up our CEO in knots and they’re hiding behind their interpretation of a ‘SPFL ruling’. Nobody has been cited in a court of law nor subject to football banning order under current legislation. Personally think the statement they should make is deliver another food bank drive as planned tomorrow and not enter the ground rather than offer posts on social media platforms. Certainly offer different opinion to those who just point, snigger and claim it’s “woah, look at me”.

Been in the building for a while. Training facilities courtesy of his friendship with Halliday

Cynical maybe, eyes on the bigger prize? Co-opted onto Executive board.

🤔 Suppose it’ll depend on who you listen to… Was done to death on here some time ago. Watt was told he could move the summer previous then enjoyed his purple patch.

Reaching out to most, if not all. And whilst this will add some to the board, I believe there’s plans to co-opt after the election when skill gaps are identified.

For me, the most important thing following election regardless of who gets in, is making sure those who put their name forward still contribute afterwards in some way or form?

Poor kid will never learn

Another belter from you. Robbie Crawford kept him out the team long after Slattery signed. Let that sink in.

First prize £200 303930 Secobd prize £75 303910

It’s awful. I’m all for the main colour, but, don’t get the need for the tartan trim.

I concur. For those dismissive, go and scratch the surface and you’ll find there’s a world of difference to your outlook.

Tongue was firmly in cheek. Even the offer of a Joe McBride with Mrs Barmack won’t see me part. It’s never been about investment for me as I’m sure it is for most.

Nae bother. Step away from the keyboard.

Have you proof of this? Monetary value? I hope Barmack offers me same. Any personal holding is greatly reduced and there’s a proposal you can increase dependant on standing so I’m not quite catching how they’ll make on any investment. Like I said, keep it factual. Been far too much misinterpreting across all platforms. We need no more.

He’s not going to shag you. Try harder.

Sanctimonious? ‘Cause it doesn’t suit your narrative? How very insular. There are numerous ‘Well fans on parade and they were referred to in the derogatory terms. Society has a lot of ills, loyal orders are way down the list for most.

Define bigot. Didn’t touch a nerve with me, I don’t tend to label fellow supporters ‘vile, inbred, bigoted scum of Scotland’ though. As for spreading hate, it shows you what little grasp you have on the subject. The scripture reading alone defines pro-Protestantism, which isn’t anti-catholic. Civil and religious liberty for all. Embrace it as you leave 😉

What about the Motherwell supporters who will take part in the return parade? And you wonder who the bigots are… Authority given in advance of club announcing a bounce game - that’s why it is allowed.

Have I missed something? What cash are they expecting to get out with? At least keep things factual.

Pattergeddon. Bet you’re a hoot in real life.