Onthefringes

I think it’s a stretch to be mentioning ‘his outing as a fan of that club’

Footballers are no different no matter what stage of career development. Differing agent approaches proved between Turnbull & Hastie circumstances.

Those who won’t feature at reserve level this season?

As I’ve mentioned, blocks pathway of others. To pay a fee, was he the best available?

Sets our youth development back though? On what I seen of him last year & it was more than most, I’m just failing to see value for money in acquiring him.

Great? Doubt we’ll see the same joy when he’s seen as a replacement for either Campbell or Turnbull...

He’s not going to ride you.

Certainly not referring to you knowing. Lets just see if the club secure the deal, certainly fits with recruitment so far.

Certainly won’t be pinning any hopes on either. Moving on...

Unlikely Scott Fox in an away shirt methinks. His old employers are known though...

No precious, no bickering from me. I inferred the non-competition as fact, you being a moderator would know that?

Poor analogy for me. We were on the front foot as we had to be against St Mirren, Tait had his game of the season then too. Didn't represent value for money for me last year, paying a required fee further compounds that problem. We do have players in front of him and there are those who watched him in other quarters where he was no better than what we have & again those being promoted behind him. How do we progress the next batch if they aren't given that chance?

Aye. Nae bother. Cheers for the input

OK, I’ll bite. Plenty on here knew, some us don’t air our dirty washing in public thinking it’s the inside scoop - I’m sure there are no prizes given for being first to give some sycophants on here information.

Hardly exclusive especially on here & a repeat on what others post. So you’ll know about the incoming striker who can play ‘along the front three’? O’Hara is no better than we have. There are players in front of him. Doesn’t represent a value for money with a years’ contract at current club to be paid up. Losing a midfielder may well change the outlook, but, suspect there would be better available if our budget was met.

Behave. I wouldn’t say so. Doubt I’d be the only one of that thinking on here. Press soundbite doesn’t mean “has been long in discussion” or “the club want him”. As for easily working it out? Player can admit he wants to stay all he wants - I’m not sure stretching any budget to grant him his wish is good recruitment In any case.

I’d rather he didn’t full stop safety wise or other. i certainly don’t buy your 95% or basically done quotes either. Your scoops each & every transfer window/close season go beyond parody.

Honestly? Club cost cutting due prohibitive testing regime, but, we’ll offer training facilities? We need to move on from O’Hara.

That's the beauty of pre-contract agreements...

Looks like it - information given differed. In other news, broken clocks are correct twice a day.

They’ve already been told.

See above reply. Need to get with current club programme methinks. That and you never find happiness where you lost it.

Think some are needing to reign expectations in. Around 5 promoted from reserve level all worthy of their chance. It's how we need to be. Survival will be key...

Are they? I’m not seeing that at all despite paper talk some months ago. Were a midfielder to leave... Wouldn’t be my first choice but, that’s another debate. White is hardly news, purchasing property locally gave the game away months back, that & his wife telling her friends in Motherwell why they were moving to the area.