Onthefringes

Your closing paragraph answers your own question. Investing in Dalziel Is impractical. It’s managed by memorial/heritage trust that wouldn’t relinquish any control to meet the requirements for our club given their main focus is their rugby interests. Suspect they’ll be strangled by their own constitution too. Community hub facilities align with various funding opportunity streams - there are individuals placed at the club and society presently who know how to attract these to the clubs’ best advantage without joint venturing.

Hibs have their own facilities at Tranent. Tie in with Dalziel is what the club have had for over 20 years and hasn’t always worked. It’s a decent facility, just doesn’t meet the needs of a Premiership club.

Had a wide player recently released by Celtic trialling recently.

False.

Our Lady's High was nowhere near Muirhouse when attended by Billy McNeill and that Cardinal fella.

Nobody’s claiming it wasn’t the third biggest fee? Yet, you claimed we didn’t accept double the original offer. You do know their original offer was £200,000 up front? Hence, your financials being a mile out...

You are a mile out on your financials. You have voiced valid concerns on options, - too many variables though. Availability, budget restraint, player willingness to come to our club to name a few. Certainly not the reason we lost yesterday... Seeing potential for freefall myself, only time will tell.

Give your head a wobble.

Less than 200 tickets left...

Anybody who follows the reserves on a regular basis will tell you Manzinga’s cameo performances have been the exception rather than the rule. It’s no surprise McIver was given the nod. i don’t buy the Brian Graham interest either.

Enough evidence to suggest McIvor is ahead in the pecking order over those mentioned.

Shankland doing well against defenders a yard slower in thought and in pockets of space they create is a whole different ball game to that in the top league. His pension pot is on a winner on his current deal.

Away stand holds what? 1200?

Don’t. Just don’t...

Sloth? Seeing him based on what? The manager stated he has youngsters ahead of him. O’Hara? Defensive midfielder he isn’t. As much as the midfield unit failed he was the weakest link against Accies.

Not condoning the action, but, more to the story than being published. The club lawyers working overtime on a few media based ‘issues’ this week.

I’d be surprised at ‘may be 1 or 2 who turn up there...’ Given places on the trip are limited. Mr Robinson describing how we manage that recently.

That opinion counts for little, it’s always been the case, the evidence is there. All 3 are very different players.

I’m not having Accies fullbacks being worth a look from our scouting department at all.

In recovery.

Semple is one of the young players ahead of Sloth going by the managers’ recent AGM address. I suspect Cornelius is more in the club thoughts also. Both only 18 years, they won’t be introduced together.

Nothing vague. Nothing to tell. Think it’s been described best in another post. I’ve not seen anything that Tait offers more than Grimshaw & I’ve watched him more than most on here this season.

I’d be stunned if Tait gets a starting berth.

Certainly doesn’t tell the full story... I’d question releasing the erm, article 5 minutes prior to the AGM - information has been available for weeks.

Are you still going on? Less of the mate too. You’re making things up now. For the record, there is no flares (of the pyrotechnic variety) in that photograph & that event was in an area of Motherwell far away from the ground & long after the match had finished. Club official approved the banner in advance & it was created on the Thursday prior to the match. Information is same employee refused its entry upon arrival at ground. It’s now for both parties to find a common ground... easier said than done.