Can't speak to that as I didn't see it but it seems like folks are getting caught up in a polarising Fraser vs Ruddy argument, which seems to boil down to "I like apples, they are nice and crisp" vs "Apples? GTF. Oranges are way more juicy" where the focus should be more upon "Where the FUCK was the defense?" Don't think the whole Ruddy/Fraser thing is being very productive. Is Ruddy being overly praised? More than likely. But he's put in performances that lead to that. is Fraser being unfairly treated? Yes - but, again, he's probably put in performances that lead to that. Defence needs sorted for Wed - get that solid again and I think the GK question becomes less of an issue.