To be fair, he's been called worse. At the Celtic game, one of our lot said he "liked the look of the big hobo". And today I messaged my bluenose brother that I couldn't believe that they let a Metallica roadie score into them...
I put my headphones in, stuck my music on and walked to up to shop to lift cash around the same time. Glad it's not just me resorting to such tactics...
Going with Andrews, closely followed by Miller and Armstrong (who I still reckon might be shite overall but was a menace tonight).
Given his defending for their goal, I'm not giving it to Casey...
2
Given the pretty public takeover chat, a 'Rangers man' willing to hold the fort until the owners come in was my initial guess. I suspect Bill Leckie won't give Rangers stick though when they appoint the inevitable foreigner rather than a Scottish manager...
Ach, every manager says that nowadays. Who's the last manager anywhere that came in promising slow, passive football? But plenty of teams produce it...
You are not wrong but right now the situation we're in, I'd settle for a new manager bounce to keep us up ahead of hopefully a more successful rebuild in the summer. Is it an ideal situation? Nope, but you can only play the hand you're dealt. And I know we've dealt ourselves the shite hand we have..
Right appointment hopefully negates a total rebuild in 12-18 months...
Like you, I've been impressed with Healy's track record. My only concern is that managing a club with one of the biggest (if not the biggest) budgets in the league trying to win titles is different to managing when there are a good half dozen clubs with more money than you and the aim is survival or midtable mediocrity. Ask Postecoglou...
442 with two wingers wouldn't work. Everyone plays three in centre midfield now. So unless you've got Ngolo Kante, or plan on playing counter attacking football with a solid defence. A solid defence we don't have. Every single full back we have is a wing back and way better at going forward than attacking. And we don't seem to have two centre backs solid enough to play in a back four. The ones we haven't aren't good enough when we play three of them.
Other than that it's a fantastic idea...