MelvinBragg

Ramsden is a steady eddie who would be a fine right back defensively. Only concern would be a lack of attacking threat. Could live with that if it means more defensive solidity...

If we bring in 2 forwards, it's only going to stunt the progress of McHugh, Erwin and Moore. For me, priority has to be finding guys to supply the strikers we have...

Would like a keeper if only to keep Hollis on his toes. As it is at the minute, we're a player or two short of a good starting eleven. Maybe only one if we're going 442 but I suspect that McCall would like to go with a similar 4231 shape that he used last season..

I reckon Ramsden is quite happy to play there. McCall seems to prefer him at centre half though. Just need to wait and see if we bring anyone else in. McManus coming in could mean Ramsden playing at right back. Alternatively Cummins might show better than Kerr preseason and McCall will have a decision to make...

Happy enough with that. Think Kerr has potential. Will he be playing week in week out? Now means we have a couple of options for right back, depending on the central defence situation...

I kind of thought that as well. No need for any more press on Sutton, I'd reckon. Given that Leanne Dempster mentioned a few signings over the next few days, it could e Sutton along with a couple of others. Unveiling the other guys gives them an excuse to wheel Sutton out to the media, given I think he only spoke to the official website on Friday.. Hopeful it's more than one new face, can't see the need for a press conference to confirm that Kerr is staying on...

The money he's made in the game, I suspect not...

Sounds like he's open to the idea of coming despite other offers. Unless he's trying to get fit and we're local. Thinking John Kennedy and McGhee...

Funny thing about Kerr. I've read here that Kerr himself thinks he's a centre back, but McCall sees him as a right back. Sound familiar? Saunders Mk II...?

Diggle's last word on Sutton was that was he was a good player but he made his bed at Hearts. Hardly a major criticism...

Did Ramsden not go abroad last year before signing his contract? That worked out.. It's already been said that McCall might be looking at Tony and Terry Rialist. Better to look at them in an intensive training environment. That and the fact that team spirit has been good recently, it won't do any harm to see how potential signings fit in with the group. And with the squad size now, probably a few spare seats on the plane anyway...

I didn't see much of Kerr last season, his few appearances seemed to be away from home. But I do remember one sub appearance from him early in the season at Fir Park when it was commented that he was too good for us to have him long term. Whether that was his true form or the more disappointing performances were more a true reflection, I don't know, but I reckon he's worth a gamble...

Given there was talk of a few new signings over the next few days on Thursday, could be one or two new faces due...

You should have tried travelling to and from Dundee for that game with two Utd fans...

Good signing for them. Part of me thought he might end up at Ibrox...

Slightly older slapper with loose morals.. Given your past track record, not impossible then...

Not impossible that we'll have three of last season's back four still playing for us next season. Keith Lasley is still there. And John Sutton knows what the club is about so there's a degree of continuity there. And most season ticket holders get a season ticket because it's their team and they always do. I know when I went to renew, who was going to be in the team wasn't a factor...

Aye, they wait til after I've renewed my season ticket before a Kris Boyd rumour surfaces. No, thanks. And people said Sutton was slow and immobile.. If we could sell Hutchinson and pick up Wilson for nothing, it'd be an outstanding bit of business but, like others, I can't see it. Having signed three players from other SPL clubs, I figure that the rest of our signings may be at the cheaper end of the market. Can't see McManus coming for the same reason...

Kyle might say he's fit but his recent record with injuries means that I'd have picked Sutton ahead of him. We can't afford guys who might spend half the season injured. But as you say, one target man is quite enough on our budget...

Naw. Just naw...

If he's not happy with the money on offer there, no chance we could afford him. Which is a shame because I'd love him back. Non starter though, I reckon...

Bob McHugh has started 8 games for Motherwell and scored 6 goals. Around 60 sub appearances, probably totalling around 900 minutes tops (average 15 minutes being generous). Assuming he finished all 8 starts (unlikely), you're looking at 1620 minutes on the field. Averaging a goal every 270 minutes. A goal every three games when not getting a run in the team to build up momentum. Aye, can't see why he got a contract...

I know the budget is being cut again but still expect us to sign at least five players. I figure that Vigurs will be on less than Law was, any keeper may be cheaper than Randolph. If Hateley was one of the higher earners, then it's safe to say that a replacement right back won't be on the same wage. This doesn't mean bringing in sub standard players, just means shopping smart. How much did Ojamaa contribute in comparison to his wage?

That's a best case scenario. And looks impressive. Take out McFadden and McManus (the two we're most likely to get outbid on) and it looks a whole lot weaker. But I'm pretty relaxed about it. In Vigurs, Sutton and Lawson, we've signed players who'd get in most other SPL sides...

Sutton has one advantage over Higdon. He's willing to play for us for wages we can afford. Be as well comparing Sutton to Lewandowski, another player outwith our budget. As soon as Higdon got beyond 20 goals, he was always going to have offers better than we could match. Is Sutton as good as him? Don't have their career stats to hand but pretty sure that Higdon's last two seasons were the best of his career. Prior to that, I suspect if you'd been offered Sutton or Higdon, opinion would have been pretty evenly split...