Lets not make this an argument about the bias of the SFA, but both Rickoza and Fat tony make good points.
I look at it as another excuse to highlight the supremacy of the Old Firm by the SFA, by showing them up to be golden boys (or bhoys given the Hooper incident AND the Aluko dive) but, of course, that in itself is a view based upon my hatred of the gruesome twosome.
I dont agree with two matches, but I can see their reasoning, and I think they just want rid of Jennings due to the betting "scandal".
I suppose it also asks the question, despite the fact that O'Connor was proved to have dived to win a penalty against St Johnstone, why was he not given a "standard" two match ban?
the SFA is a farce, it always has been and looks like it always will be. When, the average SPL attendance is in its hundreds (won't be long now) it might decide to see sense.