bobbybingo

They do it because they can afford to cut their noses off. We obviously can't, and you won't see potential investors for dust if no Old Firm fans was part of the deal.

As long as clubs are paying us for the damage their fans cause there's no need to increase the prices. It comes down to a straight question of whether you want those fans there or not, and we clearly can't afford to be banning them.

Yeah, on Sky.

Very true, although most of the online bile I've seen since full-time has come from Rangers fans. Shoe will be on the other foot and booting us next week, as it did Hearts yesterday. The pair of them really do believe the other teams exist only to suit their requirements.

He doesn't come out for enough, but that was never his ball.

He was between Mugabi and Casey. You think Kelly should have come out for that?

You're a bloody Jonah.

Why is 23 the magic number?

Devine was absolutely done. He got away with 2 or 3 just before he was subbed.

Yeah. Maybe we could afford players of a higher standard, like Hearts.

What's that gonnae change when it comes to playing the Old Firm?

A minimum of 1 Celtic goal will be added.

Tie a new contract to the back of a 3 legged tortoise. If he can catch it, he can sign it.

Collum, so chance. But well done to him.

Bye bye Butcher.

Devine's got away with a few there.

Vale's ponderous.

Every chance we'll get Heartsed today, but if it stays level long enough, mibbe the Celtic players will implode the same way their fans have.

There was talk of Luton cutting the loan short in January, but I think he's still there. Been an absolute waste of time for him.

Wilson's just been appointed 'Director of Corporate Communications and Responsible Banking and member of the Executive Committee of Santander UK.' He starts in March, so you'd suspect his resignation at Motherwell is connected to that.

Where's Declan Gallagher when you need him?

I'd have serious concerns about him crossing the road by himself. I doubt even his harshest critic on here would imagine for one second he or his agent were oblivious to his contract situation. The board left themselves wide open to criticism/ridicule on this and they deserve it. But when they did issue the statement and folk immediately began foaming online about Kettlewell getting a year's extension last night, you have to wonder if those fans are actually interested in anything other than moaning.

The wording didn't suggest Kettlewell was unaware his contract had been extended. It clearly stated this had been agreed when he signed the permanent deal - does McGarry really think it was necessary to clarify Stuart Kettlewell was one of the people who agreed to it and signed the contract on that basis?

Must be doing the rounds. I'm not sure how anyone could honestly believe the manager was unaware his contract had been extended.

Was that on Facebook by any chance?