Dazzer Posted September 21, 2011 Report Share Posted September 21, 2011 Agree with that. Thought he looked a genuine threat for most of it, after looking terrified to get involved in the match on Saturday. On Saturday I'd play him on one wing with Daley on the other, give Jennings a rest and move Nicky Law into a more central position to help feed off Higdon and give Murphy a hand. A lot of Humphrey's good work is undone by the fact there's nobody there to get on the end of it, with Law arriving from the middle and Daley covering the other flank it should see a huge improvement. Good point Scott, i like your thinking Humphrey looked every bit a danger last night, and he showed some real pace down the right, Daley and Humphrey together would be if nothing else box office to watch. Maybe even play Daley along side Higdon, or just behind, food for thought. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wee g Posted September 21, 2011 Report Share Posted September 21, 2011 Humphrey needs a spell on the bench!!! or in the stand!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazzer Posted September 21, 2011 Report Share Posted September 21, 2011 Humphrey needs a spell on the bench!!! or in the stand!! Yea your right Wee G, he can sit next to Craggs, Murphy, Jennoe,Forbes,Higdon and any other of the failures we have at the club Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Diggle Posted September 21, 2011 Report Share Posted September 21, 2011 Humphrey needs a spell on the bench!!! or in the stand!! Can you speak up mate. Canny hear you - your mouth's full of shite Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brazilian Posted September 21, 2011 Report Share Posted September 21, 2011 Humphrey did have a good game last night but at times he still performs like a schoolboy with no game knowledge its wonderful to see him stretch his legs leaving everyone in his wake but if he then just crosses the ball to an opposition player and they counter attack its no better than a craggs hump up the park you can argue all you want about someone should be there, but he's got eyes and quite often there is no claret and amber anywhere near the box when he sends it across the face of goal I've said it a dozen or so times on here , he could be a phenomenal player but he'll need a fulltime coach and a shrink to get him there for now I'm happy he's a Motherwell player , but I still don't think he's got 90 minutes in him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orinoco Posted September 21, 2011 Report Share Posted September 21, 2011 humphrey has one of his better games, and should be dropped. Aye, that will do his confidence a world of good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Stall Posted September 21, 2011 Report Share Posted September 21, 2011 Good point Scott, i like your thinking Humphrey looked every bit a danger last night, and he showed some real pace down the right, Daley and Humphrey together would be if nothing else box office to watch. The problem with this thinking is that Humphrey more often than not, doesn't show up. If he played every game like he did lastnight then he would be on my team sheet first, but he doesn't! The boy needs to develop consistency or else whats the point in playing someone who is a diddy 4 games out of 5?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wee g Posted September 21, 2011 Report Share Posted September 21, 2011 Can you speak up mate. Canny hear you - your mouth's full of shite Maybe take the cock out your ears, then you might be able to hear. Ps. I forgot it`s only your opinion that counts on here, tosser! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Diggle Posted September 21, 2011 Report Share Posted September 21, 2011 Maybe take the cock out your ears, then you might be able to hear. Ps. I forgot it`s only your opinion that counts on here, tosser! Correct! And don't you fuckin forget it! What I was initially gonna say, Mr Stevie Wonder was that you couldn't possibly have been at the game last night - because after a nightmare on Saturday Humph pulled his socks up and gave it some last night. But then again half the pish we've read on here post the game - you probably were at the game, If after that improvement, when it was demanded by fans and manager alike, you think that it's a good thing to banish someone to the bench then fair enough. I agree that McCall needs to be freshening things up far more than he does and there were folk who played last night who would benefit from a seat on the bench. Humphrey on last nights showing is by no means one of them! It's your wee cock that was in my ear - that's how I never noticed it was there! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WishyWell Posted September 21, 2011 Report Share Posted September 21, 2011 you can argue all you want about someone should be there, but he's got eyes and quite often there is no claret and amber anywhere near the box when he sends it across the face of goal See, I always thought the same, and up till last week I would have wholeheartedly agreed with you. Then I watched a training exercise at fir Park last week when my boy's coach was working with the wide midfielders and strikers on hitting the by-line and firing over crosses. When my son put his first cross over and the goalie caught it unchallenged, I was berating him under my breath for not looking up and picking out one of the two strikers. But then the coach stopped them and explained how it was the strikers' responsibilities to make the runs to the front and back posts, and the winger's/midfielder's respoponsibility to whip the cross over to there. As soon as the guy goes down the line, the strikers should be busting a gut to get to where they should be and if the ball comes over to no one, the crossing player is entitled to scream at the striker for not being there. As this came from one of the club's greatest striking legends, I was reminded once again how little I know about how the game actually works! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brazilian Posted September 21, 2011 Report Share Posted September 21, 2011 and I'd agree in part as well But Chris is sooooo FAST that even the next quickest player in our team has no chance of being there much of the time so just want him to glance over before deciding on what is essentially a pass to the opposition if our players aren't even in the box sometimes all he would have to do is aim for 6-9 yards out as we have players making up the ground just not in line with him Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wee g Posted September 21, 2011 Report Share Posted September 21, 2011 Correct! And don't you fuckin forget it! What I was initially gonna say, Mr Stevie Wonder was that you couldn't possibly have been at the game last night - because after a nightmare on Saturday Humph pulled his socks up and gave it some last night. But then again half the pish we've read on here post the game - you probably were at the game, If after that improvement, when it was demanded by fans and manager alike, you think that it's a good thing to banish someone to the bench then fair enough. I agree that McCall needs to be freshening things up far more than he does and there were folk who played last night who would benefit from a seat on the bench. Humphrey on last nights showing is by no means one of them! It's your wee cock that was in my ear - that's how I never noticed it was there! I was at the game last night and it was his best performance of the season, but still pish! We have signed Omar Daley who by all accounts is faster than CH and has more experience than him. Humphrey was diabolical on Saturday, but he was always going to start last night. WHY? Because McCall hasn`t the bottle to change the team He has had 10 games this year so far, scored 1 and not a lot of assists. So this is from someone who has meant to have the ability to change a game. And it wisnae my wee cock in your ears, that was my balls hitting your ears whilst you were sucking my wee cock. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WishyWell Posted September 21, 2011 Report Share Posted September 21, 2011 and I'd agree in part as well But Chris is sooooo FAST that even the next quickest player in our team has no chance of being there much of the time so just want him to glance over before deciding on what is essentially a pass to the opposition if our players aren't even in the box sometimes all he would have to do is aim for 6-9 yards out as we have players making up the ground just not in line with him Fair point. He is a tad quicker than big Higdon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Stall Posted September 21, 2011 Report Share Posted September 21, 2011 We have signed Omar Daley who by all accounts is faster than CH and has more experience than him. On lastnights evidence, there is noway that Omar is faster than Humphrey! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazzer Posted September 21, 2011 Report Share Posted September 21, 2011 I was at the game last night and it was his best performance of the season, but still pish! We have signed Omar Daley who by all accounts is faster than CH and has more experience than him. Humphrey was diabolical on Saturday, but he was always going to start last night. WHY? Because McCall hasn`t the bottle to change the team He has had 10 games this year so far, scored 1 and not a lot of assists. So this is from someone who has meant to have the ability to change a game. And it wisnae my wee cock in your ears, that was my balls hitting your ears whilst you were sucking my wee cock. If we are playing the form in the last 10 games overall why is Murphy playing other than his 3 goals or so ? If Humphrey was diabolical Saturday what was Murphy, Higdon, Lasley, and Jennings, Hamell Craggs ? Humphrey played very well last night and deserves a start spot Saturday if not injured. Murphy was poor again and so was Jennings, but i would still put them in this Saturday as they are better than we have from the bench Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wee g Posted September 21, 2011 Report Share Posted September 21, 2011 If we are playing the form in the last 10 games overall why is Murphy playing other than his 3 goals or so ? If Humphrey was diabolical Saturday what was Murphy, Higdon, Lasley, and Jennings, Hamell Craggs ? Humphrey played very well last night and deserves a start spot Saturday if not injured. Murphy was poor again and so was Jennings, but i would still put them in this Saturday as they are better than we have from the bench I never mentioned any of the above cos this is a thread about Chris Humphrey, but my thoughts on the players mentioned above, just for you Dazzer. Murphy...Played out of position in about half the games so far this season. When played in his natural position he is our main goal threat. Higdon... Not the most energetic footballer we have seen, canny jump (couldn`t slip a £5 under his feet, when jumping), i would give Bob or Gary Smith their chance, to see what we get, at least they will run a lot more. Lasley... Not been at his best in the last 3 games, but started the season well. Jennings... Thought he looked over weight when he returned from pre-season, not hit the heights of last season, so give Carswell a run and lets see what he can do. Hamell... Last 3 games not been at his best, but has had one of his best starts to the season. Craggs... who do we replace him with at the moment. we could play Page alongside Clancy, but Clancy is not a CH. So Craggs has to stay there until Hutchy and Saunders are fit. As for all of the above being better than what we have on our bench, how do you know that, cos they have never had a proper run in the 1st team, until they do we will never know what they can do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazzer Posted September 21, 2011 Report Share Posted September 21, 2011 I never mentioned any of the above cos this is a thread about Chris Humphrey, but my thoughts on the players mentioned above, just for you Dazzer. Murphy...Played out of position in about half the games so far this season. When played in his natural position he is our main goal threat. Higdon... Not the most energetic footballer we have seen, canny jump (couldn`t slip a £5 under his feet, when jumping), i would give Bob or Gary Smith their chance, to see what we get, at least they will run a lot more. Lasley... Not been at his best in the last 3 games, but started the season well. Jennings... Thought he looked over weight when he returned from pre-season, not hit the heights of last season, so give Carswell a run and lets see what he can do. Hamell... Last 3 games not been at his best, but has had one of his best starts to the season. Craggs... who do we replace him with at the moment. we could play Page alongside Clancy, but Clancy is not a CH. So Craggs has to stay there until Hutchy and Saunders are fit. As for all of the above being better than what we have on our bench, how do you know that, cos they have never had a proper run in the 1st team, until they do we will never know what they can do. Well McCall must see them in training to make those decisions, like you i can only trust the Gaffer in his team selections and if your not starting he cant see them as good enough. I reckon Humphrey will improve with the arrival of Daley, not only to offer comp for places but overall footballing knowledge he can pick up from him, Omar is 30 years old and an international player who whether we like it or not has played at a much higher standard than most of our players in the squad. That with Humphrey watching him can only help him improve him as a player. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brazilian Posted September 21, 2011 Report Share Posted September 21, 2011 Dazzer are you going to declare any vested personal or business interest in Chris (or even now Omar?) just asking so I can decide whether to take you serious or not Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SS1886 Posted September 21, 2011 Report Share Posted September 21, 2011 Humphrey is a matchwinner on his day. At the moment he is bereft of confidence however I don't think too many players have covered themselves in glory in the last 3 games. We have started the season well and again punching above our weight. 2 defeats to the Old Scum and St. Johnstone and pens last night. Still not that bad but still not enough to give Humphrey the dogs abuse in the early posts. So get off his back ang support the lad. He's alright in my book. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
'Wellfan 2k7 Posted September 21, 2011 Report Share Posted September 21, 2011 Humphrey played a blinder last night. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Busta Nut Posted September 21, 2011 Report Share Posted September 21, 2011 Murphy...Played out of position in about half the games so far this season. When played in his natural position he is our main goal threat. Higdon... Not the most energetic footballer we have seen, canny jump (couldn`t slip a £5 under his feet, when jumping), i would give Bob or Gary Smith their chance, to see what we get, at least they will run a lot more. Lasley... Not been at his best in the last 3 games, but started the season well. Murphy has been pish for months Higdon - yer miles oot here, Bob and gary would run more? maybe but they are, at the moment, half the Footballer Higgy is Lasley, was great last night tae Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScottW1886 Posted September 22, 2011 Report Share Posted September 22, 2011 McHugh and Smith would "run more"? Sometimes the best thing you can do as a striker is stand still and you'll create space for yourself rather than simply running into a crowded box. As for Humphrey, excellent point(s) about him being correct to hit the cross and put the onus on people making the correct runs, although perhaps taking a look at times. That said, whenever he does slow down to take a look he has half the support screaming at him for not taking his man on and hitting the byline, as by that point the full back has had a chance to get back at him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlmostFrazzled Posted September 22, 2011 Report Share Posted September 22, 2011 The fact is if Humphrey was a winger who pasted everyone week in-week out, went by his man every single time he went one on one, could deliver a perfect cross more often than not AND pile in a few goals he would not be playing for Motherwell. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Busta Nut Posted January 3, 2012 Report Share Posted January 3, 2012 His problems started when he married Kim Kardashian. the divorce after 72 days hit him hard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.