Big Wispy Flossy Posted November 17, 2011 Report Share Posted November 17, 2011 One things for sure - the OP made a rip roaring Bellend of themselves and further reduced what little credability the Mst had left into the bargain #Footinmouth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yabba's Turd Posted November 17, 2011 Report Share Posted November 17, 2011 Which is why it was restored, I'm all for transparency, I'm also mostly against swear filters and banning unless you happen to be jealous of everything I stand for and have achieved. Far be it for us to censor arseholes, I say let them be a complete arsehole and let the forum members decide... This is a fan's forum, not the trust, the SAC or the club for that matter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
underboyleheating Posted November 17, 2011 Report Share Posted November 17, 2011 It's official - the Supporters Advisory Committee has finally shown what it's all about - discarding our mascots! We were "shocked" and are in "awe" of this suggestion!! Claret and Amber have been with us for years and are loved by many! Kids in particular love and associate with them, and can join the Claret &Amber Club! They add colour and friendly cheer to match days and have a commercially consistent visual marketing link to our Club - Now SAC would wish us to condone a "robo cop" style of mascot - what ill timed nonsense! It may not be a life threatening issue ( well maybe for Claret & Amber !) but let's make sure we KEEP CLARET & AMBER BEARS!!! Claret and Amber will just need to grin and bear it. At the end of the day I am sure they wont bear a grudge. Cometh the hour, cometh the Steelman. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ONeils40yarder Posted November 17, 2011 Report Share Posted November 17, 2011 The Trust should be focussing on the Phil O'Donnell tribute which I believe will be unveiled before the Dundee Utd game. Anybody any idea what this is actually going to be? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigshinyhead Posted November 17, 2011 Report Share Posted November 17, 2011 I don’t really know where to start to be honest; I suppose the first question for clarity needs to be: Is the original post the official position of the MFC Trust and the board or are the comments contained within it essentially the position of one individual? My view for what it is worth is that these types of comments really achieve very little and smacks of ‘my da is bigger than yours’. I may be missing something really fundamental but surely anyone involved and giving up personal time to put themselves forward, whether it be from the Trust, the SAC or indeed the Association, all pretty much want the same thing. That is for supporters to be involved and bring forward ideas - GOOD and BAD – and for those ideas and feedback to be considered and debated. If that general point is accepted then surely it does no good whatsoever to be ridiculing some the very people who have put themselves forward in the first place? Given everything positive that is happening at the club at the moment and remember, with the backdrop of some very difficult times for Scottish Football, surely it is now the time for us (SAC, Trust and Association) to be galvanized and not to create more distance between supporters. This is a call for unity; it is high time any old issues are put to the side and for the 3 organisations to merge into one, stronger and more effective group. That is my view for what it is worth. Leeann This post highlights the pitfalls of composing your comments in a Word document then copy and pasting into a forum response. Sometimes you get great big spaces between your paragraphs that you probably didn't want. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaag Posted November 17, 2011 Report Share Posted November 17, 2011 This post highlights the pitfalls of composing your comments in a Word document then copy and pasting into a forum response. Sometimes you get great big spaces between your paragraphs that you probably didn't want. Way to go. Exactly what difference does it make? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brazilian Posted November 17, 2011 Report Share Posted November 17, 2011 there has been some bizarre sh1t on here the last few days, but you gotta laugh when some fella is concerned about the format of a post and the program used to create it it is the top tip of the day Beware the internet and the large spaces in posts 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Diggle Posted November 17, 2011 Report Share Posted November 17, 2011 To be fair - I read the post and though I had reached the end about 6 times - only to find as I slowly scrolled down that there was more to get through. A bit like the end of a Coldplay concert Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Craig Posted November 17, 2011 Report Share Posted November 17, 2011 This post highlights the pitfalls of composing your comments in a Word document then copy and pasting into a forum response. Sometimes you get great big spaces between your paragraphs that you probably didn't want. Reg can use MS if she wants, isn't that right Reg? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigshinyhead Posted November 17, 2011 Report Share Posted November 17, 2011 Reg can use MS if she wants, isn't that right Reg? What about the big giant spaces but? Where will it all end? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Pangloss Posted November 17, 2011 Report Share Posted November 17, 2011 Far be it for us to censor arseholes, I say let them be a complete arsehole and let the forum members decide... Umm. Can I... Better not. Might get deleted and I may be banned. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weeyin Posted November 17, 2011 Report Share Posted November 17, 2011 To be fair - I read the post and though I had reached the end about 6 times - only to find as I slowly scrolled down that there was more to get through. This post highlights the pitfalls of reading internet forums on a small screen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yabba's Turd Posted November 17, 2011 Report Share Posted November 17, 2011 Umm. Can I... Better not. Might get deleted and I may be banned. Naw ye fucking cannae ya cockjockey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kmcalpin Posted November 18, 2011 Report Share Posted November 18, 2011 I don't really know where to start to be honest; I suppose the first question for clarity needs to be: Is the original post the official position of the MFC Trust and the board or are the comments contained within it essentially the position of one individual? I may be missing something really fundamental but surely anyone involved and giving up personal time to put themselves forward, whether it be from the Trust, the SAC or indeed the Association, all pretty much want the same thing. Pretty much my view too. However the Trust really does need to clarify the post's status. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Onthefringes Posted November 18, 2011 Report Share Posted November 18, 2011 You must love skelfs, the amount of fences you sit on... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
santheman Posted November 18, 2011 Report Share Posted November 18, 2011 It also highlights what happens every time we have an International break and don't have a game to talk about Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Wispy Flossy Posted November 19, 2011 Report Share Posted November 19, 2011 The turf wars have went global. The fake sheikh has infiltrated the fleece wearing mile outs and tipped off the sun as to the plight of poor claret and amber. Cue the pictures of a dozen Mst shitting on a matalan thermal jerkin in some form of propaganda pose in the Sunday star tomorrow Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DosserJoe Posted November 20, 2011 Report Share Posted November 20, 2011 I don’t really know where to start to be honest; I suppose the first question for clarity needs to be: Is the original post the official position of the MFC Trust and the board or are the comments contained within it essentially the position of one individual? My view for what it is worth is that these types of comments really achieve very little and smacks of ‘my da is bigger than yours’. I may be missing something really fundamental but surely anyone involved and giving up personal time to put themselves forward, whether it be from the Trust, the SAC or indeed the Association, all pretty much want the same thing. That is for supporters to be involved and bring forward ideas - GOOD and BAD – and for those ideas and feedback to be considered and debated. If that general point is accepted then surely it does no good whatsoever to be ridiculing some the very people who have put themselves forward in the first place? Given everything positive that is happening at the club at the moment and remember, with the backdrop of some very difficult times for Scottish Football, surely it is now the time for us (SAC, Trust and Association) to be galvanized and not to create more distance between supporters. This is a call for unity; it is high time any old issues are put to the side and for the 3 organisations to merge into one, stronger and more effective group. That is my view for what it is worth. Leeann Leeann, I post this not as an official view from the Trust, but as an individual who has devoted a lot of my personal time to the organisation and the club. I'll tell you honestly and openly why I don't favour the groups merging. The first meeting of the SAC, I attended. Your opening gambit was 'this can be as formal or informal as you like, we can have the advisory committee as a formal group with Terms of Refference or we can have it as an informal group with people coming and going dependant on their personal time'. Under your left hand was a document Motherwell Supporters Advisory Committie Terms of Refference. Therein lies the rub; it was always going to be a formal group that sings to your tune. That in my opinion is both a waste of time and will never be representative of the Motherwell support. Do I support the statement? Nah. The SAC are a group of people that work in the background, with no elections or the likes. They don't need to put out statements every other week to keep their members happy (coz they don't have any). The've asked for an opinion and taken an undeserved slagging for it. Am I glad the statement was posted? Over the bloody moon. Why? Because its made me see your true colours. You've been on the phone to my successor this week basically slagging me and Martin Rose off. You've said you've been reluctant to deal with the Trust in the past as you've not had faith in the individual's running the organisation. So that explains why everytime I used to call you, the call was dingied and not returned. That explains why the only times you called me were when you wanted something. Like the 5 grand in our bank account? Oh and that brings me nicely to my next point. Shares. Did you, or did you not, on several occasions promise me that you were getting the shares owed to the Trust from John Boyle transferred? All of a sudden, John Boyle knows nothing about the shares getting transferred. No, you'd never spoken to him and were basically trying to hoodwink me and the Trust board into handing over 5k ring fenced for Share purchases. Did you call me up and ask if you could use the Trust as a vehicle to dispose of Boyles shareholding? Yes you did. Then, without consultation, the Well Society emerges. I spoke to Derek Weir on this and he said that the way you handled this was poor. Derek gave me a good explanation as to why the Trust could not be used. My concern but is that you'll not put the wheels in motion for any Supporter ownership unless it suits you personally. This unfortunate incident has brought your true colours to the fore. You don't respond to calls or emails from the Trust. You have a selective memory and fabricate the truth surrounding our dealings. But then your on a message board sticking up for your puppet in the blink of an eye. Probably because it suits you. Leeann, I'll be honest and say that the 2nd year of my position as Trust chair was poor; largely due to work commitments. You knew this but so I would have expected you to accommodate this. The Trust and Association are independent. I would support these groups merging. I would not however favour a merger with the SAC as you clearly call the shots on their dealings. I'll give you this. You've done more good for the club than previous job holders. Your ideas are a breath of fresh air and your definitely pushing us in the right direction. A football club but for me is a bit like a large social club. It's not a big business and it relies completely on supporters sticking their hands in their pockets. To that end, supporters deserve to be listen to, something you appear to be incapable of. I hate washing my dirty linen in public, but I don't take well to being slagged off behind my back. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
delboy Posted November 20, 2011 Report Share Posted November 20, 2011 please can you put your toys back into your pram Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DosserJoe Posted November 20, 2011 Report Share Posted November 20, 2011 Nope. Do you like getting slagged off behind yer back? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wee jo Posted November 20, 2011 Report Share Posted November 20, 2011 Nobody likes being slagged off behind there back, but why not try and act like adults and sort it out by e-mail, then the press don't read any disharmony between people meant to be pulling in the same direction Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steelboy Posted November 20, 2011 Report Share Posted November 20, 2011 This unfortunate incident has brought your true colours to the fore. You don't respond to calls or emails from the Trust. are you sending the emails in a daft font with 12 point claret lettering? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DosserJoe Posted November 20, 2011 Report Share Posted November 20, 2011 Fair point, but a line has been crossed for me. As I said, not a fan of doing my washing in public. I just feel its really important everyone knows what she's like. Supporter Ownership/Involvement is on the cards. If its going to work, it needs the club to listen to the fans. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GregyScotland Posted November 20, 2011 Report Share Posted November 20, 2011 I think something external is required, and the trust currently is that. Another voice for the fans is always needed, and I think that could be taken away if the trust and the SAC were to merge, as the SAC is coordinated by club. Id be all for the Supporters Association and the trust merging, and having a good working link with the club and the SAC. On another note I think its hugely unprofessional for the Chief Executive to be responding on message boards when wee squabbles come up, a bit like what had happened with the thread about the ticket office last christmas when she came on and responded in a rather childish way. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.