Finlay Posted October 25, 2012 Report Share Posted October 25, 2012 To be fair Higgy's membership is very rarely mentioned when he is getting dog's on a matchday. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Special aka Posted October 25, 2012 Report Share Posted October 25, 2012 To be fair Higgy's membership is very rarely mentioned when he is getting dog's on a matchday. Exactly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
East_Stand_Al Posted November 6, 2012 Report Share Posted November 6, 2012 I wonder when we'll hear from our newly formed commitee, had a couple of weeks to get together. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steelboy Posted November 8, 2012 Report Share Posted November 8, 2012 is anyone else disappointed that the chairman of the well society is someone who has ( and might still be for all i know) been a club employee? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrahamH Posted November 8, 2012 Report Share Posted November 8, 2012 That was my first thought when I saw who it was. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lobey_Dosser Posted November 8, 2012 Report Share Posted November 8, 2012 Indeed, very poor decision imo that compromises the ethos of the society. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steelboy Posted November 8, 2012 Report Share Posted November 8, 2012 That was my first thought when I saw who it was. i was disappointed at some of derek weir's comments at the meeting the other week. no time frame on electing people to the club board, kicking the transfer of shares into the distance rather than making it a priority and putting unrealistic conditions on the society taking the controlling interest. i can't understand why we would need to raise over a million before the sfa would let the society take control, are the current club board underwriting the club personally to that extent? the society board needs to demonstrate that they are not just going to be there to rubber stamp weir/wilson/mcmahon dipping into the money raised by the fanbase. graham barnstaple being the chairman gives the impression that the society will be a lap dog rather than pushing towards full fan ownership. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kmcalpin Posted November 9, 2012 Report Share Posted November 9, 2012 is anyone else disappointed that the chairman of the well society is someone who has ( and might still be for all i know) been a club employee? Well its your Society and if you're not pleased make your feelings known to the Board. Its a democratic body. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steelboy Posted November 9, 2012 Report Share Posted November 9, 2012 Well its your Society and if you're not pleased make your feelings known to the Board. Its a democratic body. when methods of communications are established i will be. the aim of the society should be full fan ownership, not propping up the whoever the current trustees to boyle's shares are. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kmcalpin Posted November 9, 2012 Report Share Posted November 9, 2012 when methods of communications are established i will be. the aim of the society should be full fan ownership, not propping up the whoever the current trustees to boyle's shares are. If you have concerns you're quite within your rights to contact Alison Wallace at the club and ask her to confirm whether or not the Chairman is employed by MFC in any capacity or works for it in a voluntary capacity. That should clear matters up. Lines of communication have already been established. For what its worth I too agree that Society Board members should be separate from the club. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OfficialMFC Posted November 9, 2012 Report Share Posted November 9, 2012 Before it goes further, it's worthwhile pointing out that Graham IS NOT an employee of Motherwell Football Club. He kindly volunteers to help me with MFC TV but doesn't take a single penny for it, be it commentating on first-team and U20s matches or contributing to the Matchday Magazine and the U20s Proggy. He is a guy who gives of his time willingly, and again, worth highlighting, without any pay or expenses and that's exactly the type of person the Well Society needs; someone who is prepared to really muck in for the love of the club. Some of the criticism is a wee bit unfair I reckon. 'Flow 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
East_Stand_Al Posted November 9, 2012 Report Share Posted November 9, 2012 Graham and his colleagues are there as figureheads surely, all decisions have to be ratified by the members, at least that is my understanding based on the meeting etc. although I would have expected the decision to appoint roles would have been ours also. As for Graham Barnstaple and his involvement with MFC TV can I just say Graham all we ask for is consistency Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kmcalpin Posted November 9, 2012 Report Share Posted November 9, 2012 Before it goes further, it's worthwhile pointing out that Graham IS NOT an employee of Motherwell Football Club. He kindly volunteers to help me with MFC TV but doesn't take a single penny for it, be it commentating on first-team and U20s matches or contributing to the Matchday Magazine and the U20s Proggy. He is a guy who gives of his time willingly, and again, worth highlighting, without any pay or expenses and that's exactly the type of person the Well Society needs; someone who is prepared to really muck in for the love of the club. Some of the criticism is a wee bit unfair I reckon. 'Flow Thanks for clearing matters up Flow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
East_Stand_Al Posted November 17, 2012 Report Share Posted November 17, 2012 I'm a little perturbed by some of the language and terminology being used in conunction with the Well Society, I thought we had elected representatives and not a "Board of Directors", and as for "They will also share their vision for the Society and how they plan to move things forward." Their vision is only relevant if its shared and approved by the members its not up to them to move things forward they are in situ to take our concerns and thoughts about moving things forward are they not? I joined the 'Well Society to have an influence in how my club is run, not so 3 guys can make unilateral decisions. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brazilian Posted November 17, 2012 Report Share Posted November 17, 2012 It was clear from the start that the society was an industrial provident society The structure is required by law, and hardly something to fuss about, unlikely it will remain at three also Their vision ( a continuation of the clubs ) is being offered to all members to discuss at a meeting it's kind of a requirement to formalise it otherwise it would be a shambles with what 800-1000 views all slightly different toceach other Think everyone should give them time to speak instead of positioning themselves for or against from an invite to a meeting 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kmcalpin Posted November 17, 2012 Report Share Posted November 17, 2012 I joined the 'Well Society to have an influence in how my club is run, not so 3 guys can make unilateral decisions. Not unduly concerned at this stage for the reasons the Brazilian has set out. Its important though that as many of us as possible attend these meetings to influence decisions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foghorn Posted November 17, 2012 Report Share Posted November 17, 2012 Not unduly concerned at this stage for the reasons the Brazilian has set out. Its important though that as many of us as possible attend these meetings to influence decisions. Agreed, and I wonder if everyone who is quick to make comment on the boards will be so eager to speak up on 6th December. As long as the chairman is strong then progress should be achievable. It would be sad if it was spoiled by petty points after the progress which has been made to date. And we should remeber that these guys were elected by the Society members and not the Football Club. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weeyin Posted November 17, 2012 Report Share Posted November 17, 2012 Agreed, and I wonder if everyone who is quick to make comment on the boards will be so eager to speak up on 6th December. As long as the chairman is strong then progress should be achievable. It would be sad if it was spoiled by petty points after the progress which has been made to date. And we should remeber that these guys were elected by the Society members and not the Football Club. If there is no facility for some sort of dial-in/conference call I expect the overseas members' voices will be unheard again. A big thing was made of the global support this initiative received - and rightly so. I hope we aren't going to be overlooked in the future discussions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foghorn Posted November 17, 2012 Report Share Posted November 17, 2012 If there is no facility for some sort of dial-in/conference call I expect the overseas members' voices will be unheard again. A big thing was made of the global support this initiative received - and rightly so. I hope we aren't going to be overlooked in the future discussions. Excellent point Weeyin, all too often, the people who are furthest away are overlooked after their early support. I am sure those involved will be reading the comments on the boards and will take note. As with all of us I presume relevant points will be taken by e-mail. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kmcalpin Posted November 17, 2012 Report Share Posted November 17, 2012 If there is no facility for some sort of dial-in/conference call I expect the overseas members' voices will be unheard again. A big thing was made of the global support this initiative received - and rightly so. I hope we aren't going to be overlooked in the future discussions. Good point. I suppose you could email Alison Wallace with any questions/ views prior to the meeting . Failing that I'd be happy to raise them on your behalf. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weeyin Posted November 17, 2012 Report Share Posted November 17, 2012 Good point. I suppose you could email Alison Wallace with any questions/ views prior to the meeting . Failing that I'd be happy to raise them on your behalf. Thanks. It's not so much the questions that are a concern to me because, as you say, I can email Alison. It's more the surrounding discussions. It's good to hear others opinions on topics and to be able to contribute them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NottsMFC Posted November 17, 2012 Report Share Posted November 17, 2012 Thanks. It's not so much the questions that are a concern to me because, as you say, I can email Alison. It's more the surrounding discussions. It's good to hear others opinions on topics and to be able to contribute them. Totally see your frustration mate, I'm an awful lot closer than you but still very difficult for me to get back to Motherwell for various reasons. Don't think it can be too difficult in this day & age to set up video conferencing so that people in your situation can actively take part in these meetings, like you say, it's ok if you have some points to make someone else can raise them on your behalf, but when those points are subsequently discussed, you are left without a voice. I'm hoping to get up for this meeting on 6/12, but it will depend on being able to get away from work for a few days, it being a Thursday definitely not helpful for me. Plus side is if can get time off, will be at Pittodrie for the cup game on the 1st Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steelboy Posted December 3, 2012 Report Share Posted December 3, 2012 is the society involved in the club's reconstruction policy? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yabba's Turd Posted December 3, 2012 Report Share Posted December 3, 2012 is the society involved in the club's reconstruction policy? No Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nethertonwellfan Posted December 4, 2012 Report Share Posted December 4, 2012 I actually don't think the club give 2 shiny shites about the Well Society. Well they do for the money the fans are pouring in but not the bollocks about ".....doing things in the spirit of the model we are trying to create." All that is a load of shite and I'm starting to get a bit sceptical that the club only done this because they were almost certain that the Rangers vote was almost certainly heading the way it went. I will reiterate that this may be a bit of a sceptical view but it's the way I feel at this moment in time. I was a supporter of the Well Society and defended it to sceptical friends and persuaded them to join. I am getting more and more disillusioned with the whole thing as the weeks and months go by. I have to say that I don't expect a vote in every single issue but this one is of fundamental importance to the future of the Scottish game. The leadership (including our board) in our game is abysmal and they spend most of their time pandering to the TV companies whilst ignoring the fans who are the lifeblood of the game. It's almost as if they're saying "who cares if the stadiums are empty, as long as we have a couple of cameramen and a commentator that's all that matters." Our club (as well as the rest) are making clear that the Rupert Murdoch pound is more important than the pound of of the guy/girl who slaves away at work all week and spends their hard earned cash on supporting a team that couldn't give a monkeys what his views are. This whole idea of splitting the league in to 3 leagues of 8 is fucking bonkers. Why don't you just have a 24 team league and do that? It's not anymore bonkers is it? Or why don't we go the whole hog and have an NFL system and have a big Grand Finale at the end? Who the hell is coming up with these ideas? My 4 year old nephew could come up with better than this. Now I'm normally an optimist and I love football and love going and normally I look on the bright side but at the moment I don't actually see one. I didn't think I would ever say just stick with what we have got now but that is the way it's going. By the way that's probably the SPL's game, punt all these bonkers proposals so that the status quo looks like a great option. I am just hoping that the SFL stay united and kick this horrible idea in to the long grass. 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.