Grant Posted August 14, 2012 Report Share Posted August 14, 2012 Would definitely just put angol straight in for hammell. Seem him at the hamilton friendly and liked the look of him. Looked good going forward, something iv never seen stevie do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haggischomper Posted August 14, 2012 Report Share Posted August 14, 2012 You've never seen Stevie Hammell look good going forward? Really? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gary_411 Posted August 14, 2012 Report Share Posted August 14, 2012 You've never seen Stevie Hammell look good going forward? Really? He can put in a decent ball with a bit of time but find myself screaming at him to overlap or play a forward ball. Not as strong or as fast going forward as Hateley in my mind. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kmcalpin Posted August 14, 2012 Report Share Posted August 14, 2012 Would definitely just put angol straight in for hammell. Seem him at the hamilton friendly and liked the look of him. Looked good going forward, something iv never seen stevie do. Can he defend though? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fat_tony Posted August 14, 2012 Report Share Posted August 14, 2012 Can he defend though? The new Moutaouakil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grant Posted August 14, 2012 Report Share Posted August 14, 2012 The new Moutaouakil He went to the Moutaouakil school of crossing so that can only be a good thing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaag Posted August 14, 2012 Report Share Posted August 14, 2012 You've never seen Stevie Hammell look good going forward? Really? So shocking you had to say it thrice! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay Posted August 14, 2012 Report Share Posted August 14, 2012 The new Moutaouakil From what I saw at the Accies game, he looks like a Moutaouakil who actually bothers his arse to get back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tweed Posted August 14, 2012 Report Share Posted August 14, 2012 Agree about Vines' tackle on Hutchy by the way. He had no intention whatsoever of going for the ball and I thought it a stick on straight red card at the time - but no. Strange, I thought the first tackle was much worse than the second. To me the first was a bit naughty because he had overrun the ball and frankly coulnae take it and was a day late whereas the second in my view was a very tired effort to get the ball, from which is eye never left. However for a foul to be a red card it needs to be: - professional foul - no - two footed - no - dangerous - I would surmise this was reckless (yellow card offence) rather than dangerous so no - over the ball - no - violent - no So to me Brines got both right as for me they were both reckless rather than dangerous. As for the left back it has to be Angol. He is the one who has some game time under his belt and if he wants to push up fine, one of Hateley's endearing qualities is that he is mediocre half way up the pitch so putting us under less pressure if we can do same at the other side who knows what will happen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.