Jump to content

Zfa


pingu
 Share

Recommended Posts

no idea where this notion he cant defend comes from. Yesterday he made 2 or 3 good blocks and his covering at times shows he can read the game pretty well for a raw 19yo kid, going forward his use of the ball + powerful running is a massive plus so he is a very useful weapon for us and has the potential to develop into a real player

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we are in danger of building this guy up a bit too much. He's come in and done reasonably well. I agree with the school of thought that he's not a left back and would be better up the pitch a bit.

 

He played well on Saturday and if he keeps his place in the team for the Kilmarnock match he deserves it.

 

But some folk need to calm it a bit with 'Hammell is finished now' talk. Stevie Hammell has had a couple of ropey matches but he's also had 300+ games as good as anything Francis-Angol has produced in his short career.

 

Give the guy time to develop, he's a teenager and still has a lot to learn.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

ZFA is not the finished article but we seem to play some excellent stuff when he is on the park. Can't just be a coincidence.

 

Not a coincidence at all. When he plays we get a left footer in an advanced position, bringing some natural width where we usually have none. Hammell rarely gets to the bye-line these days, so it's good to have an option like ZFA to bring some much needed width in the final 3rd. The lad's done well, and hopefully can continue to build on his performances and progress.

 

To say Stevie Hammell is done is just daft. ZFA is young and WILL be inconsistent. We need Hammell's experience and delivery, but it's absolutely brilliant to have an additional option down the left who can play instead of or in front of one of the most consistent players in the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again, for ZFA (said in a couple of threads), I've heard that he is indeed highly rated, but has leg problems of some sort which have led to him 'dropping' to our level, as opposed to at least a mid range club, after leaving Spurs, as he'd be dubious on the ability to pass a medical front.

 

I like him, despite (or perhaps due to) his clear rawness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just hip issues apparently. Along the lines of the "weak ankles" or "bad knees" stories that we've all heard from folk who never made it.

 

And by mid range, I essentially mean Championship. Not many people drop from the Premiership's higher regions into the SPL, without a trial or similar at a level higher than the SPL.

 

I hope my source was wrong/we get lucky, but I'm relatively sure that Angol wont be a good sell-on, sadly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's the first I've heard of any niggles concerning ZFA though in the eighteen months or so he's been with the club, that's not to say there isn't any truth to what you say.

 

But two things spring to mind. How did he pass a medical at Fir Park and the tale of Chris Porter, a player whom Oldham fans had plenty to say about his alleged fitness, or lack of, and we managed to a get a return of something like £400,000 for.

 

Suppose time will tell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's the first I've heard of any niggles concerning ZFA though in the eighteen months or so he's been with the club, that's not to say there isn't any truth to what you say.

 

But two things spring to mind. How did he pass a medical at Fir Park and the tale of Chris Porter, a player whom Oldham fans had plenty to say about his alleged fitness, or lack of, and we managed to a get a return of something like £400,000 for.

 

Suppose time will tell.

 

I'm on board with the middle ideas, especially the Porter one, as he was highly regarded as unfit before he appeared with us, by the Oldham fans.

 

We, as a club, in my opinion, in recent years, have been phenomenally good at managing training and the general health of the squad in order to manage illnesses/minor niggles. If you look at our first team, we're very very rarely without members of it, outwith lengthy absences (say 4 weeks or more), so it's perhaps an offshoot of that, for players like Porter.

 

Again, what I've heard may be utter bullshit, but it's something to keep in the back of the mind perhaps. No more than that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...