Aberdeen

[Onthefringes]

Top 'team' performance. I only made the second half (didn't want to crow 'em, so prayed for no more goals in second half). Sponsors man of the match announced with 75 minutes on the clock said it all...

 

"Kau mu tagasi tasku" to Mark Reynolds as he took his bow I'll bet.

 

 

 

[foghorn]

Henrik by a mile

[nethertonwellfan]

I have to pick Ojamma some of his touches were sublime and created real openings.

 

 

[Moorey]

I Thought everyone put in a great performance but Ojamma gets the nod from me.

 

 

[Ya Bezzer!]

Would have given it to Jamie Murphy if he had scored the penalty. Three goals and an assist? I think that ought to get you the man of the match award.

 

Two goals and an assist though? That ought to get you the man of the match award as well, except you have to give it to Ojamaa. So Ojamaa it is. First player to get a second man of the match award from me this season.

 

Sadly it looks at least one of the two won't be here for much longer.

[Shaka]

I voted for ZFA but in my opinion there was barely a baw hair in it between Hutch,ZFA,Ojamaa + Murphy. Murph misses out after stealing Henriks thunder and spunking our chance of 5 with the shitest pen Ive possibly ever seen.

[weeyin]

Sadly it looks at least one of the two won't be here for much longer.

 

I agree it's sad (although we always seem to cope with departures). From a purely selfish, financial perspective, though, it's good to see potential targets hitting top form around the transfer window and possibly bump up their price!

[daver]

Was gonna vote null as always BUT IT'S BEEN STOLEN!!!!

 

I always wondered about the purpose of Null Vote as it just skews the percentages and you can just click on Show Results.

 

Anyway, I had to vote for Ojamma after that performance.

[Cakes]

I always wondered about the purpose of Null Vote as it just skews the percentages and you can just click on Show Results.

"Null Vote" should be used as a vote for "No-one, they were all pish", it records the abstention and shows how many people felt that way. "Show Results" should be used by those who aren't in a position to vote but would like to see the results of the poll.

[daver]

I think it did use to say that but it was obviously being used by those who weren't there such as Haggischomper. Maybe that's why it's no longer an option or is it up to whoever sets up the poll?

[Haggischomper]

Show Results you have to click all the time, null vote let you immediately see the votes every time you log into the the thread. Being a null vote I didn't think it counted in actual percentages. Apologies if it did.

[daver]

No big deal. I just wondered what the point of it was and why there were two options that seemed to do the same thing. Didn't realise you had to click show results each time.