Jump to content

Well Sign Kallum Higginbotham On Loan


somethingsomethingwell
 Share

Recommended Posts

Certainly appears he may be. Falkirk fans rave about him anyway. Doesn't seem to have made much of an impact for Huddersfield, but hopefully he'll fill the hole left by Murphy. Guess there'll be a chance that he could become permanent in the summer as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know enough about KH to say what type of forward he is and where he can be best utilised certainly agree that McHugh should be due more of an extended run in the second part of the season.

 

His occasional contributions from the bench such as against Aberdeen last season and St Johnstone earlier this year have shown he's always had the capacity to offer something but towards the turn of the year he seemed to be delivering on about as much of a consistent basis as you can, coming on from the bench.

 

Certainly seems due a few starts over an extended period to see what can deliver over ninety minutes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, I think some are suggesting that Ojamaa could play the Murphy role and McHugh could play centrally..

 

This option would make the most sense, however as a new signing comes in the gaffer usually wants to see how they fit in. Bob might still have to fight for a start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Higginbotham has been signed on loan then I imagine he'll be turning out for the well (sarcasm)

 

This carry on where loan players are portrayed as undeserving mercenaries who don't deserve a place over existing players is nonsense.

 

The game has changed and loan players are a huge part of it suiting many clubs who can reduce long term financial risk.

 

We also need to remember that, while we've had some disappointments, we've also been served very well by some loanees

 

If he's good enough play him

If mcHugh is better then play McHugh

Simple really

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree with Steve Diggle above that simply whoever is best plays . I would , however prefer a starting slot to be McHughs to lose . He has done enough in his gametime up til now to merit a chance , if he fails to deliver then bring Higginbotham in .

If the team is to push on for a European challenge then its got to be a case of best 11 , not favourite 11 .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

would agree with people that McHugh should start upfront far more mobile than Higdon and can vet on the end of humphs drilled crosses! He works hard and makes up for the little work Higdon does! Also gets close to Higdon and links up well!

 

 

 

Having seen alot of Higdon and Murphy while both are gd players neither seemed to be able to play upfront together!think McHugh allows the team to function alot better imo

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

would agree with people that McHugh should start upfront far more mobile than Higdon and can vet on the end of humphs drilled crosses! He works hard and makes up for the little work Higdon does! Also gets close to Higdon and links up well!

 

 

Having seen alot of Higdon and Murphy while both are gd players neither seemed to be able to play upfront together!think McHugh allows the team to function alot better imo

 

+1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...