Partick Thistle

[Andy_P]

Your thoughts and votes please.....

[Steve Diggle]

Kallum Higginbotham by a mile :-)

[Brazilian]

Some good performances , even if most of them looked rusty and off form.

 

if Las played a chunk of the match with ligament damage he's made of tough stuff

 

Big Mick's goal put him in contention, but I'd go with

 

Faddy, not for 90minutes of excellence but he lit the touch paper and instilled belief that we could take the points

[underboyleheating]

Kallum Higginbotham by a mile :-)

He certainly caused us a lot of problems and the turning point came when they took him off.

 

As for our man of the match I will go for Faddy as my Thistle mate thought he was the main difference in the game.

 

 

[Lobey_Dosser]

Thistle fans must have been spewing when Higginbotham was substituted, we couldn't handle him.

 

McFadden our motm by a distance. Fantastic assist for Ainsworth's goal and dragged us to the win when the going got tough. Good to see him last the 90 mins.

[StAndrew7]

Faddy for me. Mention for Gunnar, who was solid.

 

Carswell looked like he was carrying a niggle but he still dug it out when he had to.

[Ya Bezzer!]

Lasley for me.

 

Must be about three in a row now!

[steelboy]

the effort was there from faddy but i thought he was poor. He was talking about getting a big move in the paper today, the guy is deluded.

 

Lasley and hutchy stood out for me again. This season so far has been a war of attrition and 7 guys have dragged us through it.

[something else]

Lasley just ahead of faddy.

[Tweed]

Lasley for me, thought he had a fine game.

[Coatsy]

Lasley here there everywhere there can't be a blade of grass he did not cover. By far the mainstay of the team

[joewarkfanclub]

Lasley.

 

Led by example. Covered every blade of grass. Involved in everything we did.

 

Excellent performance.

[foghorn]

the effort was there from faddy but i thought he was poor. He was talking about getting a big move in the paper today, the guy is deluded.

 

Lasley and hutchy stood out for me again. This season so far has been a war of attrition and 7 guys have dragged us through it.

 

Don't normally get involved in this rubbish but you are the deluded one

[mfc88]

Voted faddy just ahead of lasley. But for them, Higginbotham was unplayable at times, why Partick took him off is beyond me. No wonder they struggle to see games out if they take their best player off with 10 mins to go!

[steelboy]

Don't normally get involved in this rubbish but you are the deluded one

 

faddy was dire again today. he was toiling from an early stage, he's miles off a proper level of fitness. he deserves credit for having a bit of fire in his belly but there is no quality.

 

today was the third game in a row where he has had a shot inside the six yard box and failed to score.

[joewarkfanclub]

faddy was dire again today. he was toiling from an early stage, he's miles off a proper level of fitness. he deserves credit for having a bit of fire in his belly but there is no quality.

 

today was the third game in a row where he has had a shot inside the six yard box and failed to score.

 

No quality?

 

I must have been at a different game.

 

Some of his link up play was excellent and his part in the second goal was outstanding.

 

He may not be 100% fit and he may never again be the player he was but he still has plenty to offer us.

[Welldaft Mk1]

The problem is we are comparing the Faddy of the past to the Faddy of today.

 

To say he was dire is typical Steel boy patter. Utter fucking garbage.

 

He was far from dire. In the second half he showed most of the skill on show and managed to effectively kill the game after we scored the 4th.

[Dosser30]

Las again. If he is injured I hope Paul Lawson can step up to the plate.

[Goggles & Flippers]

Las for me, just edged Faddy, captain's performance.

[Judge Jules]

Null vote for me cause i'm a dick who chose pints and soccer saturday over Fir Park ! Was under heavy hangover pressure to be fair

[MelvinBragg]

Dunno who voted for our centre halfs. Both had extremely ropey afternoons...

[Kmcalpin]

A null vote from me. Overall I thought that the result was down to a good all round team performance. We had 4 different scorers for example. No-one had a very poor game and no-one had a great game. Most individual players had a mixture of good aspects and poor aspects.

[Goggles & Flippers]

Dunno who voted for our centre halfs. Both had extremely ropey afternoons...

 

I imagine the same characters that voted for Gunnar in the wake of the Aberdeen game

[Ya Bezzer!]

Dunno who voted for our centre halfs. Both had extremely ropey afternoons...

 

Extremely ropey?

 

Didn't have their best games but McManus headed a 88th minute winner which is surely going to get a few votes and Hutchinson made a terrific block on the penalty spot that would surely hit the back of the net.

 

Partick's first goal was a poor one to lose but otherwise most of the problems Partick caused us were down the two weakened flanks.

 

Don't remember Partick winning too many headers in our box, one in the first half that was about it.

[daver]

I thought they completely bossed their centre forward and while Hutch was done like a kipper for the first, big Mick wasn't at fault at the goals. He was unlucky not to equalise and won the game for us with a thunderous header. For those reasons and for leading by example I voted for McManus.