makaveli Posted July 15, 2014 Report Share Posted July 15, 2014 Josh Law? This is Josh Laws first full time gig.. He's also more a full back than a midfielder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kmcalpin Posted July 16, 2014 Report Share Posted July 16, 2014 He's also more a full back than a midfielder. You might be right, time will tell. I'm simply basing my view on Stuart McCall's description of him as "a similar type of player to his brother in that he’s a midfielder who likes to get on the ball and create". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
superward Posted July 16, 2014 Report Share Posted July 16, 2014 This is Josh Laws first full time gig.. He's also more a full back than a midfielder. From McCall's post match Fulham interview its clear he does not see him that way. but does see him as one to play behind the striker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steelboy Posted July 16, 2014 Report Share Posted July 16, 2014 From McCall's post match Fulham interview its clear he does not see him that way. but does see him as one to play behind the striker he might have changed his mind after saturday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MelvinBragg Posted July 16, 2014 Report Share Posted July 16, 2014 From McCall's post match Fulham interview its clear he does not see him that way. but does see him as one to play behind the striker In my opinion, that's where we should be playing Vigurs. No real pace required, just an ability to pick a pass. I'd like to see us play a 4231 Nielsen/Twarzik Reid Ramsden McManus Hammell Lasley Carswell/Leitch Ainsworth Vigurs Thomas/unnamed left winger Sutton For those saying Sutton can't play up front himself, I'd be hoping that it would turn into almost a 433 with wingers pushed forward when attacking... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ONeils40yarder Posted July 16, 2014 Report Share Posted July 16, 2014 Badly, badly, badly need a striker signed up as soon as possible....far higher priority than a central defender in my opinion. In fact I'd say we need to sign a real goalkeeper before we sign a central defender. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
superward Posted July 16, 2014 Report Share Posted July 16, 2014 he might have changed his mind after saturday. Doubt it as he said it after the game... I thought law was promising. He clearly needs match practice and to get up to speed but thought he showed good movement, willingness to get on the ball and decent control. He chose the wrong option a few times and his one shot was way off but I do think he will come good and be a good team addition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
superward Posted July 16, 2014 Report Share Posted July 16, 2014 In my opinion, that's where we should be playing Vigurs. No real pace required, just an ability to pick a pass. I'd like to see us play a 4231 Nielsen/Twarzik Reid Ramsden McManus Hammell Lasley Carswell/Leitch Ainsworth Vigurs Thomas/unnamed left winger Sutton For those saying Sutton can't play up front himself, I'd be hoping that it would turn into almost a 433 with wingers pushed forward when attacking... Wouldn't change much with that. I would definately go with Twardzik as mistake aside he looked solid on Saturday. Carswell over Leitch for me. For me, either Thomas on left, if not, then Vigurs out left and Erwin or Law behind Sutton. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steelboy Posted July 16, 2014 Report Share Posted July 16, 2014 Doubt it as he said it after the game... I thought law was promising. He clearly needs match practice and to get up to speed but thought he showed good movement, willingness to get on the ball and decent control. He chose the wrong option a few times and his one shot was way off but I do think he will come good and be a good team addition. i thought he eventually showed a few good touches when he started going to look for the ball but he didn't have much of a clue about what he was supposed to be doing playing behind sutton and looked utterly lost for the first 15-20 mins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
punk_in_drublic Posted July 16, 2014 Report Share Posted July 16, 2014 In my opinion, that's where we should be playing Vigurs. No real pace required, just an ability to pick a pass. I'd like to see us play a 4231 Nielsen/Twarzik Reid Ramsden McManus Hammell Lasley Carswell/Leitch Ainsworth Vigurs Thomas/unnamed left winger Sutton For those saying Sutton can't play up front himself, I'd be hoping that it would turn into almost a 433 with wingers pushed forward when attacking... 100% with this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malky79 Posted July 16, 2014 Report Share Posted July 16, 2014 Postiejim still no told us who? The board deserves to be told! Yeah this, as it about the only interesting thing on this thread and also fuck me who really gives a toss about John Porteous going to Hibs. Everyone moves on eventually, sure it's sad to see long serving staff go but if as suggested it's a move cloer to home for probably more money fair play to him. As for Leanne Dempster well who really cares, her job is with Hibs now and it really makes no difference if people leave to go to Hibs or go anywhere else. Porteous will be replaced and life will go on. Same as if she pinches the groundsman or anyone else, I suspect we won't have a mass exodus to Easter Road however so really it's trivial. Like to see this thread reinvigorated by an actual signing or two as that is an area we definitely do need to see some movement on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Onthefringes Posted July 16, 2014 Report Share Posted July 16, 2014 Our rigid (the clue is in the adjective) system is tried and tested, can you honestly see Mr McCall changing this for Thursday night? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ya Bezzer! Posted July 16, 2014 Report Share Posted July 16, 2014 Would be surprised if we don't start with exactly the same personnel as we did against Fulham. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tickle Pickle Posted July 16, 2014 Report Share Posted July 16, 2014 This is Vigurs year!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
superward Posted July 16, 2014 Report Share Posted July 16, 2014 Pearo is in training. Personally I would take him on as he could do well and we need some pace and direct play on the left. He didnt leave in the best way...but he was young, we make mistakes....let the crazy comments commence! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 16, 2014 Report Share Posted July 16, 2014 We're running low on gingers. Sign him up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
makaveli Posted July 16, 2014 Report Share Posted July 16, 2014 Pearo is a bit of a dick, also I can't be the only one to think he's past it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Welldaft Mk1 Posted July 16, 2014 Report Share Posted July 16, 2014 Pearo is in training. Personally I would take him on as he could do well and we need some pace and direct play on the left. He didnt leave in the best way...but he was young, we make mistakes....let the crazy comments commence! Interesting - that said we are well served fro midfielders...so a strange one from that point of view.. Maybe we could deploy Thomas as a striker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 16, 2014 Report Share Posted July 16, 2014 Pearo is a bit of a dick, Based on something he did ten years ago. also I can't be the only one to think he's past it. Based on absolutely nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
superward Posted July 16, 2014 Report Share Posted July 16, 2014 Pearo is a bit of a dick, also I can't be the only one to think he's past it. A dick because of something he did 10 years ago? Let's move on shall we... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnstone Posted July 16, 2014 Report Share Posted July 16, 2014 Pearo was brilliant for us. No idea how he has done down south, but might be worth a punt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew23 Posted July 16, 2014 Report Share Posted July 16, 2014 This is Vigurs year!! Very probably. His contract is up in the summer, another player to boost on the free... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lobey_Dosser Posted July 16, 2014 Report Share Posted July 16, 2014 I'd be delighted to see Pearson back. And his pal Quinn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaka Posted July 16, 2014 Report Share Posted July 16, 2014 Lets see if we can find a generous Director and bring back Pearson,Clarkson,McFadden + Quinn seeing as all 4 are available, Higdon too! Then we can wait till January and sign up Ojamaa,Hateley,Randolph,Humphrey + Law on pre-contracts, maybe get big Hutch in on loan. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Well Up For It! Posted July 16, 2014 Report Share Posted July 16, 2014 Lets see if we can find a generous Director and bring back Pearson,Clarkson,McFadden + Quinn seeing as all 4 are available, Higdon too! Then we can wait till January and sign up Ojamaa,Hateley,Randolph,Humphrey + Law on pre-contracts, maybe get big Hutch in on loan. Paul Slane is available on a free too, don't forget him... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts