Glasgow Branch Player Of The Year---2015/16

[livivoice]

That time of the year again when an average score from a group of oldies is given to all the players who start a match watched by 4 or more of us. Some games were not marked because we had less than 4 present due often to bad circulation , varicose veins or plain tiredness! Marks were out of 10 for each game.

 

See the scores for what they are and for those who go into perma rage because Mc Manus scores high just chill.

 

At the end of the day its just our collective opinion .

 

1. Ripley 96.

2. Mc Manus 95.

3. Mc Donald 90.

4. Johnson 86.

5. Lasley 85.

6. Moult 82.

7. Hammell and Law 73.

9. Pearson 55.

10.Kennedy 48.

11. Hall 37.

12 .Ainsworth 36.

13. Cadden 34.

14. Laing 25.

15. Chalmers 22.

16. Jack Leitch 20.

17. Gomis 12.

18. Thomas 10.

19. Fletcher 7.

20 Samson 5.

 

Other players who scored but who left the club during the season;

 

Grimshaw 37.

Taylor 8

Clarkson 3.

 

Feel free to pull to pieces.

[ropy]

Taylor 8, invalidates the rest.

 

Could the scores be divided by the number of games played to see whose average was best. A step too far?

[Waldo]

Taylor 8, invalidates the rest.

 

Could the scores be divided by the number of games played to see whose average was best. A step too far?

So one guy plays one great game and wins player of the year!

[ropy]

Just wondered what the average was. Sorry.

[Frazzie]

I'm going to guess that Pearson is probably your highest rated player, and that you rated Taylor over 4 games.

[weeyin]

I thought the system they used over here to rank College Football Teams was the most complicated. Looks like I was wrong.

[MelvinBragg]

I'm going to guess that Pearson is probably your highest rated player, and that you rated Taylor over 4 games.

My guess (if it's games started), Wes Fletcher or Jack Leitch probably average the highest...

[sbcmfc]

The system is probably weighted in favour of goalkeepers as they're most likely to play 38 games.

 

Although looking at the scores, you are either exceptionally tight with your scoring, or only marked about 12 games, which I suppose makes it a bit of pot luck who gets points.