Spiderpig Posted 4 hours ago Report Share Posted 4 hours ago 8 hours ago, joewarkfanclub said: Younger, with a sell on value is our demographic.... Correct but younger, with ability and a sell on value would be better, quality over quantity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toxteth O'Grady Posted 4 hours ago Report Share Posted 4 hours ago Louis Moult also leaving Tannadice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spiderpig Posted 3 hours ago Report Share Posted 3 hours ago 59 minutes ago, Toxteth O'Grady said: Louis Moult also leaving Tannadice. I know his best days are behind him and his injury record is not the best but he'd still be a big upgrade on the alleged strikers we have now. That said I don't think we should be signing him again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJC Posted 35 minutes ago Report Share Posted 35 minutes ago 3 hours ago, Toxteth O'Grady said: Louis Moult also leaving Tannadice. No doubt there will be the usual clamour from the usual suspects in our support for us to sign him again. Those same suspects who were happy to see us mugged off by us signing McFadden the second and third time and some of them would probably be happy enough if we offered McFadden a three year deal tomorrow. But absolutely under no circumstances should we be going anywhere near Louis Moult this summer. He’s had his time with us and it’s been and gone. It’s in the past so let’s leave it there and enjoy the memories. I wouldn’t be surprised if he ends up at St.Mirren with Robinson mind you. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FirParkCornerExile Posted 20 minutes ago Report Share Posted 20 minutes ago 2 hours ago, Spiderpig said: I know his best days are behind him and his injury record is not the best but he'd still be a big upgrade on the alleged strikers we have now. That said I don't think we should be signing him again. He's better than anything we have and normally I'm dead against the charity service we offer to former players and yes the pull for Moult is strong because of the feeling he has for the club and vice versa. That said he's one Id take a chance on and add as a squad player, he IS BETTER than what we have , he would not cost a fortune. A one year deal as a squad player is no great risk. Christ we paid £250,000 for AP and I'm still yet to be convinced about him or the fact whether he will actually play for us again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weeyin Posted 13 minutes ago Report Share Posted 13 minutes ago 3 minutes ago, FirParkCornerExile said: He's better than anything we have and normally I'm dead against the charity service we offer to former players and yes the pull for Moult is strong because of the feeling he has for the club and vice versa. That said he's one Id take a chance on and add as a squad player, he IS BETTER than what we have , he would not cost a fortune. A one year deal as a squad player is no great risk. Christ we paid £250,000 for AP and I'm still yet to be convinced about him or the fact whether he will actually play for us again. A one year deal for a squad player who we know will struggle to be fit for half a season is a waste of money. I hope Wimmer has better ideas than that. Moult was great when he was here. When we sold him, he was crocked and has struggled to play an entire season ever since. It's a shame for the guy, but we shouldn't be signing him any more than we should have re-signed van Veen. Bring him back as a coach to teach new signings how to shoot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FirParkCornerExile Posted 11 minutes ago Report Share Posted 11 minutes ago 8 minutes ago, weeyin said: A one year deal for a squad player who we know will struggle to be fit for half a season is a waste of money. I hope Wimmer has better ideas than that. Moult was great when he was here. When we sold him, he was crocked and has struggled to play an entire season ever since. It's a shame for the guy, but we shouldn't be signing him any more than we should have re-signed van Veen. Bring him back as a coach to teach new signings how to shoot. I totally get that and those who wouldn't touch him and many of the reasons they cite are not unreasonable however when you think how much money we've spent for forwards who couldn't score in a barrel of fannies Id take a chance on him. Surprised United they are letting Gallagher go . Thought he did OK for them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mad Dog Posted 7 minutes ago Report Share Posted 7 minutes ago 4 minutes ago, weeyin said: Bring him back as a coach to teach new signings how to shoot. Isn't that John Obika's job? Unless MW is going to move some of our coaching staff on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.