santheman Posted January 16, 2020 Report Share Posted January 16, 2020 I suspect 1% of the fan base will be horrified. The other 99% won’t give a toss Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steelboy Posted January 16, 2020 Report Share Posted January 16, 2020 3 minutes ago, santheman said: I suspect 1% of the fan base will be horrified. The other 99% won’t give a toss It's not just about the fanbase. Do we get the Paddy Power deal with a convicted Robinson as manager? I doubt it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
texanwellfan Posted January 16, 2020 Report Share Posted January 16, 2020 16 minutes ago, Winning by Name said: That's because it is quite different. IF he is found guilty then I don't think he can stay. Which as someone else said earlier on this thread is very inconvenient. It’s already very inconvenient at this stage Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
postiejim Posted January 16, 2020 Report Share Posted January 16, 2020 Let's keep our powder dry at this time folks, comments can be made after his court appearance. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weeyin Posted January 16, 2020 Report Share Posted January 16, 2020 I know this is an crazy thought, but maybe wait for a trial (with facts and evidence and stuff) and an actual verdict, before sacking him. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbcmfc Posted January 16, 2020 Report Share Posted January 16, 2020 44 minutes ago, Pepper said: Domestic violence is quite obviously seen differently 22 minutes ago, weeyin said: Agreed. But given he has plead not guilty, police confirmed there were no injuries and there hasn't been a trial or a verdict yet - I'd still contend that potentially life-changing injuries dished out by Gallagher and Quinn are more serious (from a criminal perspective. I'm not advocating in favour of domestic violence here!) In the court of public opinion, “hitting a woman” is probably seen as worse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twistandshout1983 Posted January 16, 2020 Report Share Posted January 16, 2020 If there is CCTV footage and it has happened then it definetly puts the club in a bit of an awkward situation whatever their thoughts. Will surely affect any chances he had of the Northern Ireland job if it turns out it is true. Until it is though which is not a definite I am sure his position wont be affected in any way and we carry on business as usual with hopefully a win on Saturday. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Stall Posted January 16, 2020 Report Share Posted January 16, 2020 Wheres Yodo?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
underboyleheating Posted January 16, 2020 Report Share Posted January 16, 2020 Thank god for CCTV, hopefully that will help his case, and perhaps prove his innocence? Edinburgh has CCTV cameras everywhere so there should be no shortage of footage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkyred Posted January 16, 2020 Report Share Posted January 16, 2020 1 hour ago, weeyin said: I know this is an crazy thought, but maybe wait for a trial (with facts and evidence and stuff) and an actual verdict, before sacking him. Yep, not the time to start being judge and jury. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Busta Nut Posted January 16, 2020 Report Share Posted January 16, 2020 I am not sure I care about this. I know that's wrong but I have faith he will be found innocent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steelboy Posted January 16, 2020 Report Share Posted January 16, 2020 30 minutes ago, underboyleheating said: Thank god for CCTV, hopefully that will help his case, and perhaps prove his innocence? Edinburgh has CCTV cameras everywhere so there should be no shortage of footage. It's the opposite. He's fucked cause of CCTV. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnstone Posted January 16, 2020 Report Share Posted January 16, 2020 Might need to stuff a phone up his arse so he can phone in tactics to Lasley. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weeyin Posted January 16, 2020 Report Share Posted January 16, 2020 12 minutes ago, steelboy said: It's the opposite. He's fucked cause of CCTV. Have you seen the footage? What's on it? Is the judge allowing it as evidence? What defence is being put up against it? Is video evidence sufficient for this specific charge or is corroboration required? Etc. etc. But keep speculating - it's really helpful. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steelboy Posted January 16, 2020 Report Share Posted January 16, 2020 32 minutes ago, weeyin said: Have you seen the footage? What's on it? Is the judge allowing it as evidence? What defence is being put up against it? Is video evidence sufficient for this specific charge or is corroboration required? Etc. etc. But keep speculating - it's really helpful. I was told that he is being charged on the basis of the CCTV footage rather than witness statements. Obviously I've not seen it but the PF are proceeding so it's unlikely to be good for him. You can be convicted on the basis of CCTV evidence alone in Scotland. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gilmour Posted January 16, 2020 Report Share Posted January 16, 2020 I’m waiting to see what VAR decides infact can’t we let sportscene decide as they decide everything else. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yodo Posted January 16, 2020 Report Share Posted January 16, 2020 1 hour ago, underboyleheating said: Thank god for CCTV, hopefully that will help his case, and perhaps prove his innocence? Edinburgh has CCTV cameras everywhere so there should be no shortage of footage. He was only arrested because of what the police seen on CCTV Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eddiemunster Posted January 16, 2020 Report Share Posted January 16, 2020 Who phoned the screws Mrs Robinson? Stephen only gave you a light blow. Whoa whoa whoa. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
well_said Posted January 16, 2020 Report Share Posted January 16, 2020 I suppose he could tell them his name is Scott brown and he would walk away Scot free(pardon the pun), that means untouchable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The African Posted January 16, 2020 Report Share Posted January 16, 2020 Whatever way you look at it, this isn't a great look for Robinson or the club. At the moment, the club statement is really all that can be said or done. We obviously have to wait for the outcome of the trial before we can deal with any conclusions that the court reaches. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
underboyleheating Posted January 16, 2020 Report Share Posted January 16, 2020 1 hour ago, Yodo said: He was only arrested because of what the police seen on CCTV Is that a known fact? I had just assumed he was perhaps confronted/reported by a random stranger to the police, as that area of Edinburgh has always been pretty busy with tourists, taxi drivers and the like. However, if the CCTV from the area is conclusive that he assaulted his partner, then I suspect the club will be under media pressure to let him go. I’m sure it all will become clear at the trial on what they have, or haven’t got against him. Until then it’s all speculation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brazilian Posted January 16, 2020 Report Share Posted January 16, 2020 34 minutes ago, underboyleheating said: Is that a known fact? I had just assumed he was perhaps confronted/reported by a random stranger to the police, as that area of Edinburgh has always been pretty busy with tourists, taxi drivers and the like. However, if the CCTV from the area is conclusive that he assaulted his wife, then I suspect the club will be under media pressure to let him go. I’m sure it all will become clear at the trial on what they have, or haven’t got against him. Until then it’s all speculation. Its a reported fact , you 've clearly not seen many/any of the reports , and its probably best to stop assuming and adding detail like implying it was his wife, when its clearly been reported (in statements of fact) it was his partner even naming her 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
underboyleheating Posted January 16, 2020 Report Share Posted January 16, 2020 9 minutes ago, Brazilian said: Its a reported fact , you 've clearly not seen many/any of the reports , and its probably best to stop assuming and adding detail like implying it was his wife, when its clearly been reported (in statements of fact) it was his partner even naming her Yes partner, not wife. I’ll amend the post to say partner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GazzyB Posted January 16, 2020 Report Share Posted January 16, 2020 Not looking good Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ropy Posted January 16, 2020 Report Share Posted January 16, 2020 4 week suspension Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.