mothman Posted February 7 Report Share Posted February 7 On 1/23/2025 at 6:40 AM, SteelmaninOZ said: Wild inconsistencies in VAR decision-making has been highlighted once again after this months review of Marley Watkins winner against Dundee Utd (in comparison to our disallowed goal v the rangers). From BBC - Collum believes the decision to award Kilmarnock a controversial winning goal against Dundee United was the correct one. Marley Watkins challenged with United goalkeeper Jack Walton in the air to head home and the goal was given following a VAR review. The Tannadice club contacted the SFA after the game to say they feel VAR continues to lead to "inconsistent interpretations" of the laws of the game. "We support the decision," Collum said. "There's not enough here for a foul on the goalkeeper. "The Kilmarnock player makes inevitable contact with the Dundee Utd goalkeeper and it's not enough to be illegal contact. We believe the goal was right to stand." VAR has been an absolutely terrible addition since introduced, at all levels, for me. As a fan you can no longer really celebrate a goal like before because you're now always anticipating some kind of intervention, and it hasn't really reduced the amount of debate or subjectivity around big decisions. Shite. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteelmaninOZ Posted February 8 Author Report Share Posted February 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.