Jump to content

Motherwell v Rangers 29/12/2024


SteelmaninOZ
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, texanwellfan said:

Well we made it to halftime. Can we stop them scoring early in the second half? Would be excellent if we could score early in the second half. 

That’s the crucial thing. For as long as I can remember we have been hopeless at managing 2-0 leads. If we want to win this this we absolutely cannot concede early in the second half.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Goalkeeper always gets the benefit of the doubt in that scenario. Watt’s hand was up and that gave him the excuse to blow for the foul.

So anyone starting mumping about bias and ‘Masonic’ referees can just sit back down. Plus I very, VERY much doubt that Kevin Clancy is a Rangers fan. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, MJC said:

Just get VAR to fuck. It’s seriously ruining the game. You have to basically second guess whether to celebrate every goal because a players elbow or big toe might be ‘offside’.

Jobsworth stuff

It's ruining the game. 3rd goal should have stood.Won't go back untill it's changed or at least improved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, robsterwood said:

It's ruining the game. 3rd goal should have stood.Won't go back untill it's changed or at least improved.

Without VAR the first ‘3rd’ would have been disallowed as Watt’s arm was us as he jumped with the goalkeeper as they always get the benefit of the doubt there. However the second ‘3rd’ would probably have stood because there wouldn’t have been a ‘forensic’ examination to find a body part that was offside going by the rules. 
 

It’s shite either way. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MJC said:

Without VAR the first ‘3rd’ would have been disallowed as Watt’s arm was us as he jumped with the goalkeeper as they always get the benefit of the doubt there. However the second ‘3rd’ would probably have stood because there wouldn’t have been a ‘forensic’ examination to find a body part that was offside going by the rules. 
 

It’s shite either way. 

Agree totally. Keeper wasn't getting it. And now they just looking for forensic reasons to deny goals. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mio said:

im not a kettlewell hater but if he wasn’t booked and then sent off that’d be a few less minutes.

That's a bit of a stretch. I know we all love a good manager-bashing on this forum, but I think the three injured players we've had may have been more of a factor in it all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, robsterwood said:

Agree totally. Keeper wasn't getting it. And now they just looking for forensic reasons to deny goals. 

It’s supposed to correct “clear and obvious errors” by onfield officials. The decision to rule out the second one patently wasn’t a “clear and obvious error”. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...