grizzlyg Posted 22 hours ago Report Share Posted 22 hours ago 5 hours ago, Mad Dog said: He's still our player for another two years though and we actually paid a fee for him, so I hope that he proves his worth next season. Yup, no way can we write off £250k. I still think he will come good Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wellgirl Posted 21 hours ago Report Share Posted 21 hours ago 1 hour ago, texanwellfan said: Not because of yesterday but I’d sign Watt (reasonable wages of course) he’s not injury prone, experienced, can actually control a ball and pass, decent level, just needs kept in line for fitness and attitude. As good as or better than a lot of the signings we’ve made the past couple of years. Agree 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dennyc Posted 21 hours ago Report Share Posted 21 hours ago 1 hour ago, texanwellfan said: Not because of yesterday but I’d sign Watt (reasonable wages of course) he’s not injury prone, experienced, can actually control a ball and pass, decent level, just needs kept in line for fitness and attitude. As good as or better than a lot of the signings we’ve made the past couple of years. I agree. In the right set up he could be an asset. I don't think he would demand a fortune in wages. Once he got riled up by Holt yesterday he really showed what he can contribute. Perhaps along with the rest make a point of handing him a nice wee fitness programme and diet sheet over the summer though. That said, no matter which attackers we end up with I hope we don't isolate a single striker and hope for miracles. On that basis I'm looking forward so seeing what a fit and supported Ap Stam can do with a decent run in the team. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wellsince75 Posted 20 hours ago Report Share Posted 20 hours ago re Watt - much would depend on our style of play. As part of a front 3 or sitting just behind the strikers he's an asset. The issue for me is 1) He's had all season to prove himself and show what he has. There's only been glimpses. 2) The formations we've often played haven't suited him. This could continue to be an issue. To retain him for me we'd have to get rid of of several other contracted forward players and play more than 1 up front. That being said he's the other loanee forward I'd consider retaining. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spit_It_Out Posted 18 hours ago Report Share Posted 18 hours ago Sorry but one good game dosent deserve a contract cause soon as it was signed on the dotted line Watt would be back to below par run outs lets not kid ourselves on here. Its time to move on. 5 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Stall Posted 16 hours ago Report Share Posted 16 hours ago When he plays well he's a real asset. The problem is we only see it once in a blue moon. For me, that was probably his best game since he returned from utd. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mad Dog Posted 2 hours ago Report Share Posted 2 hours ago 14 hours ago, Big Stall said: When he plays well he's a real asset. The problem is we only see it once in a blue moon. For me, that was probably his best game since he returned from utd. I agree with you for the most part. However, there's been no lack of effort from him all season and his patchy form is probably more due to him not getting many minutes, formations leaving him isolated and teammates not being on the same wavelength. I'd be open to the idea of him staying with us if he fits into our budget. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.