Radford Posted August 9, 2009 Report Share Posted August 9, 2009 I come in search of information, guys. I do the visitors notes for the St Johnstone programme and rather than just publish the player profiles that (certainly at First Division level) appear in most programmes, like to go into a bit more depth, so am looking for an indication of what Jim Gannon is likely to do next week. I've posted the following on Pie & Bovril but with little (no) response so thought it worth giving it a shot over here. Can any Motherwell fans tell me how your likely to line up? The score centre on Sky Sports had you down as playing a back three on Thursday night, is that right and has Gannon used that system before? From what I can gather, Ruddy will get the nod in goal and Reynolds and Craigan will be in central defence, whether it's a two or a three. Who is likely to be on the right of the defence and is Hamell or Hutchinson likely to get the nod on the left? Will the three new boys all likely start in midfielder, or is Coke the only one guaranteed his place? Is Forbes a central midfielder and where does Slane play? Murphy and Sutton up front, barring any new arrivals? Who are your other striking options? Any answers would be appreciated, thanks. As an aside, really looking forward to the match which should hopefully be an open affair and played in front of a big crowd... well, big by Saints' standards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frazzie Posted August 9, 2009 Report Share Posted August 9, 2009 We're no tellin' ye! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tweed Posted August 9, 2009 Report Share Posted August 9, 2009 The reason we're no telling ye is no because we'reawkward bastards btw but because Gannon has played every game differently and I think its likely there will be changes again. I would think Reynolds will play a defensive midfield role. Craigan and Hutchison as th two centre halves. Ruddy in goal is a stick on. Sutton will be up top. But how he sets the rest up both personnel and positional wise is anybody's guess. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frazzie Posted August 9, 2009 Report Share Posted August 9, 2009 The reason we're no telling ye is no because we'reawkward bastards btw but because Gannon has played every game differently.... Jim Gannon phoned me last night and told me exactly how he's going to line up in Perth, what his formation and tactics will be, the full sha-bang. But ah'm still no' tellin' ye, cos ah'm an awkward bastard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al B Posted August 9, 2009 Report Share Posted August 9, 2009 Indeed! Gannon seems to be the kind of manager that plays the specific opposition of that day, rather than having a standard setup. We could have an educated guess as to the basic structure of it, but the team we put out at the weekend will be designed to try and take points from St. Johnstone away, and could likely be fairly different to that which is put out to try and take points from Killie at home the following week. Your stick-on's will be fairly accurate though, Ruddy in goals, Craigan and Reynolds will both play (although where Reynolds plays will depend on where Gannon thinks he will be most effective on the day). Sutton will be up front, more than likely with Coke and Forbes somewhere behind him, and Slane out wide. Anyone else could be anywhere, again depending on what the boss feels is the best setup for St. Johnstone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MelvinBragg Posted August 9, 2009 Report Share Posted August 9, 2009 I don't think you're the programme editor, I think you're Derek McInnes... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DEWELL Posted August 9, 2009 Report Share Posted August 9, 2009 What a fab thread. .The truth is that WE dont know what JG is going to do we're in the dark too. But what i DO know is that we'll PUMP you 3-0. All the best with you're article. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Bones Posted August 9, 2009 Report Share Posted August 9, 2009 Can only echo others thoughts. Gannon has sprung a surprise in his selection fro every match so I've really no idea. We won't play with 3 at the back though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gullane Posted August 9, 2009 Report Share Posted August 9, 2009 Hi Radford. The worst thing you can do is predict a formation - 4-4-2, 3-5-2. The reason being, it is likely to change throughout the match. Jim Gannon likes flexibility and creativity. Also, don't assume players' positions. Jim O'Brien - winger has played right back twice now. Reynolds will definitely start, but he could be centre back, left back or centre midfield. Of the new signings, Coke is the only certainty to start. From our youngsters, you should see Forbes. Slane is grabbing lots of plaudits but he is still only 17 and shouldn't start every game. But with his pace and confidence, I suspect he will start in Perth. I like the fact you are trying to write a bit more than the obvious. If you do want to inform the Saints faithful then I suggest you advise them to expect the unexpected. O and the away end will be full. 2 good young managers up against each other on Saturday. Cheers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radford Posted August 9, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 9, 2009 Cheers for the feedback and even saying you can't predict what Gannon will do is a help. I'll be sure to note it all down for Derek McInnes the article. If I could put you all out a bit more though and ask how you'd regard the following players. Nothing too specific required (and I take on board the point about players like O'Brien being moved about), only if they are naturally defenders, midfielders or forwards. Players in question are Archdeacon (striker?), McHugh (striker?) and Page? I'd assume two of the lads listed in your Europa League squad, McPake and Meechan, are unlikely to be involved? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Special aka Posted August 9, 2009 Report Share Posted August 9, 2009 Derek, it's difficult to know how our line-up will appear. It'll be an attacking one though, that's for sure. Skaville to McDiarmid maybe a long journey but I'm looking out my MFC boxers C'mon ye 'Well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy_P Posted August 9, 2009 Report Share Posted August 9, 2009 Cheers for the feedback and even saying you can't predict what Gannon will do is a help. I'll be sure to note it all down for Derek McInnes the article. If I could put you all out a bit more though and ask how you'd regard the following players. Nothing too specific required (and I take on board the point about players like O'Brien being moved about), only if they are naturally defenders, midfielders or forwards. Players in question are Archdeacon (striker?), McHugh (striker?) and Page? I'd assume two of the lads listed in your Europa League squad, McPake and Meechan, are unlikely to be involved? Archdeacon's injured so you won't see him on Saturday Radford. Archie is a forward and only made his debut against Llanelli in the 2nd leg of the 1st qualifier so not much to go on in terms of the first team. Linked well with Jamie Murphy in the youths and was on loan at Albion Rovers for a spell last season, though the Rovers fans according to their forum weren't overly enthused about him. Bob McHugh is quite an exciting prospect. He's not huge physically but looks a powerful wee guy and within minutes of making his debut at 16 had put Hibs skipper Rob Jones on his backside and almost scored. He got his first senior goal against Flamurtari and will I think get more opportunities as the season goes on. Jonathan Page was signed from Portsmouth a couple of seasons ago and like the other two boys mentioned graduated through the youth set up. Has played three times as a substitute at right back but I believe (some of the guys who follow the youths more closely may correct me) he's more accustomed to playing in central defence. Hope that helps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brazilian Posted August 15, 2009 Report Share Posted August 15, 2009 Can any Motherwell fans tell me how your likely to line up? Radford do you understand what we were trying to say now would anyone care to guess how Mr Gannon is likely to line up his squad for next weeks Killie game Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nethertonwellfan Posted August 15, 2009 Report Share Posted August 15, 2009 Can radford tell me why the pubs in perth are shite? and why the police are arseholes ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wellworn Posted August 15, 2009 Report Share Posted August 15, 2009 Can radford tell me why the pubs in perth are shite? and why the police are arseholes ? ffs sober up mate Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brisbaneMFC Posted August 15, 2009 Report Share Posted August 15, 2009 Radford. Jim Gannon, loose Cannon. In a good way, hopefully. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fatcalf Posted August 15, 2009 Report Share Posted August 15, 2009 Can radford tell me why the pubs in perth are shite? and why the police are arseholes ? Guid day oot wis it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nethertonwellfan Posted August 15, 2009 Report Share Posted August 15, 2009 Guid day oot wis it? It would have been if the pubs never waited till we PAID for our drinks and then told us no football colours allowed Perth sheep shaggin wanks ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WellAyrshire Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 Guid day oot wis it? lost ma jacket and house keys so thats all guid in ma book Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wellworn Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 lost ma jacket and house keys so thats all guid in ma book Aye your jacket was more off than on. Maybe you left it in that big dancing babe from the pub's hoose. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WellAyrshire Posted August 16, 2009 Report Share Posted August 16, 2009 Aye your jacket was more off than on. Maybe you left it in that big dancing babe from the pub's hoose. tried to swap shoes with her, she wisnae wearing it at all. Perth babes are 10 times nicer looking than the romanian ones Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.