Ian-in-Oz Posted May 26, 2010 Report Share Posted May 26, 2010 When the post split fixtures were annonced i remember JB complained to the SPL about it & the loss of revenue. Does anyone know if anything ever came of that or was it swept under the carpet & JB decided not to pursue it any further? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
casey Posted May 27, 2010 Report Share Posted May 27, 2010 Not heard anything else so you're probably right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rinkydink Posted May 27, 2010 Report Share Posted May 27, 2010 Might be bollocks but story I heard was that there was supposed to be a director representing MFC on the fixtures committee but he had managed to miss the 3 meetings leading up to the split... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finlay Posted May 27, 2010 Report Share Posted May 27, 2010 Correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't our last four league games broadcast live on SKY or ESPN? If this IS the case isn't it possible we got the money we lost and a wee bit extra? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wellfan1984 Posted May 27, 2010 Report Share Posted May 27, 2010 If the deal is similar to the Setanta deal then we got no extra money from Sky or ESPN for them showing the games. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaka Posted May 27, 2010 Report Share Posted May 27, 2010 thats true, The Old Firm get £4.5m each, the other 10 split £4m (£400k each) no matter who is involved in live games Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjw Posted May 27, 2010 Report Share Posted May 27, 2010 3,500 v dundee utd and 6,000 paying reduced money against hibs would eat into any money gained through the tv deal surely Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DunnyMFC Posted May 27, 2010 Report Share Posted May 27, 2010 thats true, The Old Firm get £4.5m each, the other 10 split £4m (£400k each) no matter who is involved in live games Thats what really annoys me the scum get a lion share of the money and the rest of us get the scraps. How can teams compete against the Old Firm when they get a significant chunk of the money <_> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al Pacino Posted May 27, 2010 Report Share Posted May 27, 2010 So to put it bluntly the Old Firm get the lions share of the money and their gate receipts remain largely unaffected as they're mostly shown away from home. The rest of the teams get a pittance and have to suffer reduced gate receipts for any game that's on live TV. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rickoza Posted May 27, 2010 Report Share Posted May 27, 2010 And the Old Firm then get all the awards for winning this and winning that, another "remarkable season" for Wattie Smith who has had a budget which was in excess of everyone else put together (bar one other obvious exception). I'd really love to see the likes of Smith manage a team on a budget say what we have, or Falkirk, or whatever. That's real management. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Diggle Posted May 28, 2010 Report Share Posted May 28, 2010 The OF have the ball at their feet and they're kicking lumps out of it. But that's not entirely their fault. The other 10 chairman have failed to collectively take them on - maybe they'll say they've tried their best but to me it looks like they've all rolled over individually and had their belly tickled. The Old Firm have nowhere to go at this particular point and the others should be taking any opportunity that arises to redress the balance a wee bit. As for our complaint - completely justified of course. However it says it all that every year the wronged team(s) complains in isolation. i'd be more impressed if Boyle / Dempster / Stillie had been as vocal in the media - in support of wronged clubs in previous seasons. Feeling aggrieved only when the ball lands in your court is slightly shallow and takes weight from our argument. The other 10 clubs need to collectively grow a set and establish some solidarity. Otherwise nowt will ever change Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.