weesacs Posted February 1, 2011 Report Share Posted February 1, 2011 http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/t...own/9383013.stm http://sport.scotsman.com/football/Willie-...r-FA.6707633.jp Dunfermline sell a player for £150k (apparently what we got for Reynolds) and this guy too, only had 4 months left on his contract Where are we going wrong? Or are we in the same bracket as Dunfermline financially? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weeyin Posted February 1, 2011 Report Share Posted February 1, 2011 I don't see 150k in either of those articles you linked. All I see is 'undisclosed'. EDIT: Plus of course we don't know how much Reynolds actually went for, add-ons etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mitch Posted February 1, 2011 Report Share Posted February 1, 2011 Also Reynolds really wasnt that great. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wellfan1984 Posted February 1, 2011 Report Share Posted February 1, 2011 By that, does that mean Andy Carroll is a better player than David Villa? Or Fernando Torres is on a different planet to David Villa? In other words, transfer fees are all down to what a team is willing to pay/receive. We seen it as better than nothing. Which in fairness was exactly right thing to do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.